Saturday, August 28, 2010
google ads
i'd like to know why one minute i'm talking to this last man who said i reminded him of one of the "Greenwood" sisters and then the next minute I get a repeated pop up ad from google, about 'Fairwood Church".
lucky guesses or intuition & then U.S. persecution
I had a couple of lucky guesses I guess.
This man I just met for a few minutes, I was looking at him and then fishing came to my mind. Like, a lot of fishing and he looked back at his vehicle and said how did I know. I said why did he look at his car? and he said well, because he thought maybe he still had his fishing rods up where I could see them. but they weren't there and I said, "I don't know, I just saw you fishing." he said he did, and then we talked about insects and insect intelligence and everything, so it was fun. he said i looked russian and i said i wasn't but i'd been told this before and recently went to russian church and he asked about it so i gave him a flyer from the russian missionaries who were there from san diego. he said he had a ukraine friend so he would maybe give it to her , or let her know about the church.
then I also met this other man earlier who, when I saw him, sort of had an impression of an angel, like a literal angel, or supernatural one I mean, and i saw him praying. i didn't tell him this and just asked if he was very religious or had he ever had a religious experience like a vision before. it's the first time i've seen this, but i know there are many others who this happens to and it doesn't make them special or better in any way. i just wondered and he said well, he'd had a vision once of jesus and then he'd had many near-death experiences where he knew he should have died but didn't. he said he couldn't count the times he had almost died and should have, and didn't for some reason. i then told him why i had asked this and what i got and thought that sort of fit. because i had been about to say to him, "you must have an angel over your shoulder" and that was sort of the impression i got. that whoever he was, good or bad i don't know, but it's not always about our own worth and sometimes more about grace of god for some reason unexplained. when i saw him praying, i think it was him, and on his knees, maybe just one point in life, i don't know, but arms up actually. then i saw the angel behind his shoulder which was not a real vision or an image even, but this idea or impression somehow, and i saw this, which was what made me think "angel over his shoulder"...in my very brief impression, the size of a very large man like 8 feet tall. shaq o'neil size vague idea. and with wings but i think it was more the idea somehow than an actual view bc real full sightings always are accompanied with such a presence, that people are afraid and have to be reassured. "fear not". it was more of an idea that perhaps HE had had a vision or spiritual experience of some kind in the past. that's what i got, right or wrong. i think that the way it fit or was confirmed to me was when he said he'd almost died a number of times and was spared for some reason. now that i think about it, if he was on his knees with his arms in the air, i guess there could have been some other situation going on too, like an arrest or other matter, but my initial impression was prayer, and i thought it had to do with him in some way and then right after is when i got the impression of an angel hovering behind him which gave me the impression of angel over shoulder idea. but then he started talking about aztecs, which are cool, but then how some of them were into cannabalism, which isn't so cool, but anyway,, that's what i got and it was probably just the simple idea of being protected from harm for some reason, sometimes. it wasn't that i had the impression that he was a holy man or anything, it was more about some situation(s). i suppose i should clarify that part better...i feel like writing what i did sounds like favor or goodness but it was only with regard to the idea of an impression of being saved from something or someone looking out in some way. it doesn't mean he is better than someone and the cannabalism talk thing did freak me out a little. but that's what i got and it wasn't a woman or a human being. it was about something spiritual so this is exactly why i asked if he'd had a vision or religious experience of some kind. who knows. maybe there was just an angel in the room who thought breakfast looked pretty good and wanted to have a look. just kidding. it wasn't for that moment, but i felt for some idea instead, for concept.
\\*****************
most of the time, i might get just one small impression from someone, or maybe not at all, it just depends. that's without really focusing at all or praying.
**************
the person i saw petting the cat yesterday, was someone i have connected with before but it might not be right. i think petting, but maybe just around, however, i think petting.
***********
then, towards the end of the night, someone who for some reason, makes me smile. peer stuff is there i guess, but he and his friend crack me up. just got something in my eye...kind of dusty here. 1:20 p.m. smirk.
***********
I am reading this book about a russian missionary today. will write out about a couple of excerpts...
******************
now, i am sort of wondering about something. i just went back and sat in the opposite direction and this time i was facing a painting which i am thinking, it is possible this man who i "saw" kneeling and praying, could have been looking at that painting and then i just caught a glimpse of what he saw, through his eyes.
it's possible he's prayed in this manner, but when i faced the painting and looked at it, i saw the same position of prayer that i saw with him. in the painting, there is a man kneeling that same way, and with his arms raised, that same way.
now, if i'm seeing egyptian stuff through someone else's eyes too...when i did, i don't know. i can't explain it.
i still think there is a slight difference though, because although the knee position was the same, the hands were lifted up more extended all the way, not just cupped like the man's in the painting. they were straight up.
still, i don't know.
with the egyptian thing, it was like i was seeing something someone else was looking at but i also thought it could be something else. i looked at this british library photo clip and i looked at hieroglyphics again and what i saw that one time, was a little bit different. in one of the paintings before i saw the more dimensional gold figure or face or whatever, it was of an egyptian and i think they were kneeling down on one knee. traditional with the outfit and style and headdress but like one knee and possibly in lighter shades of tan, yellow, or very pale yellow or something and not in really bright contrasts of say, purple and white or anything. but that was a figure which flashed by among a few others, and then the gold one with the eyes is the one i mainly focused on. there were hieroglyphics too, i'm sure, but not in a table of them, i didn't see any kind of a composite table.
it reminded me of when i was studying hieroglyphics on my own though, and i had a little book on it. i got into it and tried to teach myself the language and studied the symbols but that was back during litigation times, in probably, 2004.
********************
this book about a man's trials in the Soviet Union, of persecution in his case, reminds me of what I am going through in the U.S. Things that I never imagined were possible in the U.S. I am hoping someone turns it around soon.
The book is "Letters from a Soviet Prison Camp" by Mikhail Khorev. I'm on p. 72.
The first chapter made me feel like crying. Then, the rest, I went through quickly and want to finish the book today.
p.16, "I replied, "I am not asking you either to keep me here or to release me. I am saying that it is unjust of you to deprive me of my freedom. If you release me now, you will be a criminal because you detained me when I was not guilty. If, however, you condemn me, then you will be guilty of an even greater crime because you condemn me when I am innocent."
****
from pg. 52, "The other witnessess testified in similar fashion. The testimonies were all extremely one-sided since they all belonged to various state organizations or to the police authorities. One woman, a former collaborator with the police, even testified that the Christians had hurled offensive and abusive language at the authorities. Such testimonies only confirmed that the witnesses knew that they with total impunity could spread any lies or slander they wished about Christians."
(hmm, why do I find I can relate to all of this? what's even worse is that those who have done this to me, most of them, call themselves Christians or are religious in some form)
This man I just met for a few minutes, I was looking at him and then fishing came to my mind. Like, a lot of fishing and he looked back at his vehicle and said how did I know. I said why did he look at his car? and he said well, because he thought maybe he still had his fishing rods up where I could see them. but they weren't there and I said, "I don't know, I just saw you fishing." he said he did, and then we talked about insects and insect intelligence and everything, so it was fun. he said i looked russian and i said i wasn't but i'd been told this before and recently went to russian church and he asked about it so i gave him a flyer from the russian missionaries who were there from san diego. he said he had a ukraine friend so he would maybe give it to her , or let her know about the church.
then I also met this other man earlier who, when I saw him, sort of had an impression of an angel, like a literal angel, or supernatural one I mean, and i saw him praying. i didn't tell him this and just asked if he was very religious or had he ever had a religious experience like a vision before. it's the first time i've seen this, but i know there are many others who this happens to and it doesn't make them special or better in any way. i just wondered and he said well, he'd had a vision once of jesus and then he'd had many near-death experiences where he knew he should have died but didn't. he said he couldn't count the times he had almost died and should have, and didn't for some reason. i then told him why i had asked this and what i got and thought that sort of fit. because i had been about to say to him, "you must have an angel over your shoulder" and that was sort of the impression i got. that whoever he was, good or bad i don't know, but it's not always about our own worth and sometimes more about grace of god for some reason unexplained. when i saw him praying, i think it was him, and on his knees, maybe just one point in life, i don't know, but arms up actually. then i saw the angel behind his shoulder which was not a real vision or an image even, but this idea or impression somehow, and i saw this, which was what made me think "angel over his shoulder"...in my very brief impression, the size of a very large man like 8 feet tall. shaq o'neil size vague idea. and with wings but i think it was more the idea somehow than an actual view bc real full sightings always are accompanied with such a presence, that people are afraid and have to be reassured. "fear not". it was more of an idea that perhaps HE had had a vision or spiritual experience of some kind in the past. that's what i got, right or wrong. i think that the way it fit or was confirmed to me was when he said he'd almost died a number of times and was spared for some reason. now that i think about it, if he was on his knees with his arms in the air, i guess there could have been some other situation going on too, like an arrest or other matter, but my initial impression was prayer, and i thought it had to do with him in some way and then right after is when i got the impression of an angel hovering behind him which gave me the impression of angel over shoulder idea. but then he started talking about aztecs, which are cool, but then how some of them were into cannabalism, which isn't so cool, but anyway,, that's what i got and it was probably just the simple idea of being protected from harm for some reason, sometimes. it wasn't that i had the impression that he was a holy man or anything, it was more about some situation(s). i suppose i should clarify that part better...i feel like writing what i did sounds like favor or goodness but it was only with regard to the idea of an impression of being saved from something or someone looking out in some way. it doesn't mean he is better than someone and the cannabalism talk thing did freak me out a little. but that's what i got and it wasn't a woman or a human being. it was about something spiritual so this is exactly why i asked if he'd had a vision or religious experience of some kind. who knows. maybe there was just an angel in the room who thought breakfast looked pretty good and wanted to have a look. just kidding. it wasn't for that moment, but i felt for some idea instead, for concept.
\\*****************
most of the time, i might get just one small impression from someone, or maybe not at all, it just depends. that's without really focusing at all or praying.
**************
the person i saw petting the cat yesterday, was someone i have connected with before but it might not be right. i think petting, but maybe just around, however, i think petting.
***********
then, towards the end of the night, someone who for some reason, makes me smile. peer stuff is there i guess, but he and his friend crack me up. just got something in my eye...kind of dusty here. 1:20 p.m. smirk.
***********
I am reading this book about a russian missionary today. will write out about a couple of excerpts...
******************
now, i am sort of wondering about something. i just went back and sat in the opposite direction and this time i was facing a painting which i am thinking, it is possible this man who i "saw" kneeling and praying, could have been looking at that painting and then i just caught a glimpse of what he saw, through his eyes.
it's possible he's prayed in this manner, but when i faced the painting and looked at it, i saw the same position of prayer that i saw with him. in the painting, there is a man kneeling that same way, and with his arms raised, that same way.
now, if i'm seeing egyptian stuff through someone else's eyes too...when i did, i don't know. i can't explain it.
i still think there is a slight difference though, because although the knee position was the same, the hands were lifted up more extended all the way, not just cupped like the man's in the painting. they were straight up.
still, i don't know.
with the egyptian thing, it was like i was seeing something someone else was looking at but i also thought it could be something else. i looked at this british library photo clip and i looked at hieroglyphics again and what i saw that one time, was a little bit different. in one of the paintings before i saw the more dimensional gold figure or face or whatever, it was of an egyptian and i think they were kneeling down on one knee. traditional with the outfit and style and headdress but like one knee and possibly in lighter shades of tan, yellow, or very pale yellow or something and not in really bright contrasts of say, purple and white or anything. but that was a figure which flashed by among a few others, and then the gold one with the eyes is the one i mainly focused on. there were hieroglyphics too, i'm sure, but not in a table of them, i didn't see any kind of a composite table.
it reminded me of when i was studying hieroglyphics on my own though, and i had a little book on it. i got into it and tried to teach myself the language and studied the symbols but that was back during litigation times, in probably, 2004.
********************
this book about a man's trials in the Soviet Union, of persecution in his case, reminds me of what I am going through in the U.S. Things that I never imagined were possible in the U.S. I am hoping someone turns it around soon.
The book is "Letters from a Soviet Prison Camp" by Mikhail Khorev. I'm on p. 72.
The first chapter made me feel like crying. Then, the rest, I went through quickly and want to finish the book today.
p.16, "I replied, "I am not asking you either to keep me here or to release me. I am saying that it is unjust of you to deprive me of my freedom. If you release me now, you will be a criminal because you detained me when I was not guilty. If, however, you condemn me, then you will be guilty of an even greater crime because you condemn me when I am innocent."
****
from pg. 52, "The other witnessess testified in similar fashion. The testimonies were all extremely one-sided since they all belonged to various state organizations or to the police authorities. One woman, a former collaborator with the police, even testified that the Christians had hurled offensive and abusive language at the authorities. Such testimonies only confirmed that the witnesses knew that they with total impunity could spread any lies or slander they wished about Christians."
(hmm, why do I find I can relate to all of this? what's even worse is that those who have done this to me, most of them, call themselves Christians or are religious in some form)
Friday, August 27, 2010
insects, eye in back of my head, and aneshka
I got the name or word that sounds like "anneshka" or "ahn-ESH-kah" this morning. I don't know if it's a Russian word my subconcious picked up from last night or what. It was when I was first out, in the morning, around 7 a.m. or possibly a little earlier. Probably 6:30 a.m. I think-7 a.m.
Then, 2 insects out of nowhere. One light grey and black striped and it was a yellow jacket but only the legs were yellow and the body was grey and black. ? and then following that, a man standing right there staring at me, wearing grey and black. Seriously. And then a bright true turquoise dragonfly followed, from out of nowhere. It was solid turquoise, like the Gordon semi truck color.
And then I went to Douglas county where I went to a house and as I turned around and walked away, I stopped in my tracks. I knew someone was looking at me and I turned and my eyes went straight to the windowblinds, which were parted, and then which, upon finding me swivel to catch this, instantly shut.
I went back to the door and someone took a long time answering. I said, "Some say I'm crazy and others say I'm psychic. If you know Judge Hotchkiss, go ahead and let him know what you saw." They said they didn't know him but one was looking down and looking away. I don't think it was an honest answer, frankly.
It may sound kind of crazy to bring it up, but I figured, psychic trumps all and so for the record,
Don't mess with me! I mean this in the best way, that I think this is possibly something God might want to convey. I don't ask for special privileges--I demand what is rightly mine.
Then I went to a school where they were there and the door open and they allowed me to use the computer for a minute.
****************
the other thing that happened was I started reading a book I was given yesterday, a biography and then I closed my eyes for a very fast second to think if I could get something, in just a couple seconds with no prep, of someone, and I for some reason, immediately saw the person and with a cat or cat around and it seemed to maybe be a grey cat and then after this I saw the grey/black bee in real life. I can't confirm it now but maybe someday i could.
That's all that I would like to share. Nothing else.
other things later maybe, not now. Goodnight and God bless those who bless my son.
Then, 2 insects out of nowhere. One light grey and black striped and it was a yellow jacket but only the legs were yellow and the body was grey and black. ? and then following that, a man standing right there staring at me, wearing grey and black. Seriously. And then a bright true turquoise dragonfly followed, from out of nowhere. It was solid turquoise, like the Gordon semi truck color.
And then I went to Douglas county where I went to a house and as I turned around and walked away, I stopped in my tracks. I knew someone was looking at me and I turned and my eyes went straight to the windowblinds, which were parted, and then which, upon finding me swivel to catch this, instantly shut.
I went back to the door and someone took a long time answering. I said, "Some say I'm crazy and others say I'm psychic. If you know Judge Hotchkiss, go ahead and let him know what you saw." They said they didn't know him but one was looking down and looking away. I don't think it was an honest answer, frankly.
It may sound kind of crazy to bring it up, but I figured, psychic trumps all and so for the record,
Don't mess with me! I mean this in the best way, that I think this is possibly something God might want to convey. I don't ask for special privileges--I demand what is rightly mine.
Then I went to a school where they were there and the door open and they allowed me to use the computer for a minute.
****************
the other thing that happened was I started reading a book I was given yesterday, a biography and then I closed my eyes for a very fast second to think if I could get something, in just a couple seconds with no prep, of someone, and I for some reason, immediately saw the person and with a cat or cat around and it seemed to maybe be a grey cat and then after this I saw the grey/black bee in real life. I can't confirm it now but maybe someday i could.
That's all that I would like to share. Nothing else.
other things later maybe, not now. Goodnight and God bless those who bless my son.
impressions last night
I had a few but I don't remember them. I remember one was of Officer Boltz in his Wenatchee police car and it was sort of connected to something else.
I'm not going to say if it was good or bad or what it was connected to.
I am forgetting about it.
I'm not going to say if it was good or bad or what it was connected to.
I am forgetting about it.
Idea For Washington Attorney General Rob McKenna
I just added it to my blog post about "Judges: 3 strikes, you're out! abolishing judicial immunity", but I thought I'd make a separate post too.
My idea for reducing the State deficit, is to abolish judicial absolute immunity, so the citizens are able to sue Judges when necessary and the Judges are more accountable. This would save the taxpayers money because when Judges are on notice, like all the rest of us, there is a better chance that the need for appeals would be reduced, and wrongful imprisonment would be reduced, and taxpayers would not be paying for the poor choices of Judges, who handle tons of cases every single day, which go badly and end up costing the system more money than necessary.
It would reduce cost required for appeal, for jail, and also for civil suits arising out of wrongful imprisonment.
You fix the foundation first, not the gingerbread trimming by the gutters. Or, another way of looking at it, is to fix the foundation which, if left unfixed, is the cause of other problems which arise from the structure.
My idea for reducing the State deficit, is to abolish judicial absolute immunity, so the citizens are able to sue Judges when necessary and the Judges are more accountable. This would save the taxpayers money because when Judges are on notice, like all the rest of us, there is a better chance that the need for appeals would be reduced, and wrongful imprisonment would be reduced, and taxpayers would not be paying for the poor choices of Judges, who handle tons of cases every single day, which go badly and end up costing the system more money than necessary.
It would reduce cost required for appeal, for jail, and also for civil suits arising out of wrongful imprisonment.
You fix the foundation first, not the gingerbread trimming by the gutters. Or, another way of looking at it, is to fix the foundation which, if left unfixed, is the cause of other problems which arise from the structure.
Computer Overheating Today...NOW & military
I started making my post about the Judges, and the laptop started the overheating thing. Then there was a break for about a half hour, until just now, when it started up again, at this time that I first posted this particular post.
My feeling is that since this seems to occur whenever I am making a blogpost some groups might not like, this is being done by persons who have a government position of some kind, or who protect government or dirty gov gangsters in some way.
Now after writing this, it quit again.
*********************************
I think it's partly done to harm and partly to make me sound nuts in the hope of discrediting me, but I don't believe that this goes as far as it used to.
No one has been able to diagnose me with any mental illness at all and I don't have anything wrong with me other than that I have anxiety and stress from what the State has done.
It's also not "psychic" because it occurs with the entire laptop humming or buzzing more than is usual. I know the difference and this is not psychic, it's military style technology.
I also know that I am again approached by far too many military persons to have any of them believe I am mentally ill at all. If you're nuts, you get approached by caring mental health professionals here and there, or social workers, not government intel.
And all the insect and other things that were happening, if it was not done through certain methods of discretion, it was done by those experimenting with and funding the latest Air Force experiments.
Several years ago, the government began approving funding for new psychic research and one of those new techniques was in, literally, teleportation.
As in "Beam me up Scotty". Most Americans would not even believe this is possible, but evidence and demonstrations were made the U.S. officials which convinced them to pool many millions into causing small objects like insects, to go from location to another location, through pyschic means. The idea was to see, if it's possible with small insects, to acheive this as human beings, to be teleported or teleport oneself from one location to the next through some type of mindpower.
The U.S. Air Force is the main group that is sponsored for this kind of research. They are the ones with the documented funding. But other branches of military are interested in other things. And you can type in a search, and find some of this information in legitimate document form, online in a word search for: teleportation, u.s. military.
That's not the only kind of experiment that is currently being conducted. The other ones are more classified, as top secret, because usually, if it's that big of a deal, or that top secret, there is no human or civilian consent involved and it is probably also harmful in some way. As "weird" as teleportation may sound, experimenting with insects is not something which harms others or which requires the consent of any human subject. There is nothing which would violate the Geneva Convention rule about torture or cruel or degrading treatment, with teleportation of insects. The other "stuff"? The other stuff involves not just non-consenting adults, but children. Which is why this ends up being "top secret" and classified, or semi-underground with other groups taking the blame but the results going to the CIA and Pentagon and other anyway, to benefit their programs. This kind of thing is highly classified because it would cause moral outrage of the public, and fear, and loss of respect in the government.
To engage in experimentation with the consent of someone, or compensation, is one thing. It is another thing entirely, to subject them to some of the kinds of things they are subjecting to--especially concerning children.
***************
I noticed something with the "overheating laptop" today. Each time I unplugged it or moved to a new location, it quit, at least temporarily. Today I went from being outside to inside and it quit for a half hour until it started up again. Then it started up and I unplugged to go to a different table and it quit for a little bit and then was starting up again.
I wouldn't confuse local gangster stuff with military either. Some of the people you would least expect to be capable of certain things, are capable.
My feeling is that since this seems to occur whenever I am making a blogpost some groups might not like, this is being done by persons who have a government position of some kind, or who protect government or dirty gov gangsters in some way.
Now after writing this, it quit again.
*********************************
I think it's partly done to harm and partly to make me sound nuts in the hope of discrediting me, but I don't believe that this goes as far as it used to.
No one has been able to diagnose me with any mental illness at all and I don't have anything wrong with me other than that I have anxiety and stress from what the State has done.
It's also not "psychic" because it occurs with the entire laptop humming or buzzing more than is usual. I know the difference and this is not psychic, it's military style technology.
I also know that I am again approached by far too many military persons to have any of them believe I am mentally ill at all. If you're nuts, you get approached by caring mental health professionals here and there, or social workers, not government intel.
And all the insect and other things that were happening, if it was not done through certain methods of discretion, it was done by those experimenting with and funding the latest Air Force experiments.
Several years ago, the government began approving funding for new psychic research and one of those new techniques was in, literally, teleportation.
As in "Beam me up Scotty". Most Americans would not even believe this is possible, but evidence and demonstrations were made the U.S. officials which convinced them to pool many millions into causing small objects like insects, to go from location to another location, through pyschic means. The idea was to see, if it's possible with small insects, to acheive this as human beings, to be teleported or teleport oneself from one location to the next through some type of mindpower.
The U.S. Air Force is the main group that is sponsored for this kind of research. They are the ones with the documented funding. But other branches of military are interested in other things. And you can type in a search, and find some of this information in legitimate document form, online in a word search for: teleportation, u.s. military.
That's not the only kind of experiment that is currently being conducted. The other ones are more classified, as top secret, because usually, if it's that big of a deal, or that top secret, there is no human or civilian consent involved and it is probably also harmful in some way. As "weird" as teleportation may sound, experimenting with insects is not something which harms others or which requires the consent of any human subject. There is nothing which would violate the Geneva Convention rule about torture or cruel or degrading treatment, with teleportation of insects. The other "stuff"? The other stuff involves not just non-consenting adults, but children. Which is why this ends up being "top secret" and classified, or semi-underground with other groups taking the blame but the results going to the CIA and Pentagon and other anyway, to benefit their programs. This kind of thing is highly classified because it would cause moral outrage of the public, and fear, and loss of respect in the government.
To engage in experimentation with the consent of someone, or compensation, is one thing. It is another thing entirely, to subject them to some of the kinds of things they are subjecting to--especially concerning children.
***************
I noticed something with the "overheating laptop" today. Each time I unplugged it or moved to a new location, it quit, at least temporarily. Today I went from being outside to inside and it quit for a half hour until it started up again. Then it started up and I unplugged to go to a different table and it quit for a little bit and then was starting up again.
I wouldn't confuse local gangster stuff with military either. Some of the people you would least expect to be capable of certain things, are capable.
Judges: 3 Strikes, You're Out! Abolishing Judicial Immunity
I propose something that the "Vanguard of the Public Trust", Washington State Attorney General Rob McKenna, would never propose.
While the AG offices propose to undo the advances made by civil rights groups, when they successfully abolished "sovereign immunity" in 1961, and while the American Civil Liberties Union seems to be an unsuccessful mitigator in this state, I propose greater advances for the rights of the public. I propose that the outdated protective law of "sovereign immunity" for Judges, is abolished.
The initial point of giving Judges "immunity" from lawsuits, was to enable them to dispense judgement without a fear of, having made an honest mistake, they are sued. It was to prevent them from being "afraid".
This is the same lousy argument that the lobbyists make for protection doctors from lawsuits, claiming their doctors would be "afraid" to practice because if they make an honest mistake, they could get sued.
This has been a powerful and misleading argument made by lobbyists, appealing to emotion rather than reason.
By the same argument, ANY American, in ANY course of business, could be "afraid" of being sued. So when then, are all of the other Americans open to lawsuits for negligence or intentional infliction of emotional distress, but not the especially designated "privileged" who so happen to be "privileged", usually, by the fact that they are backed by huge insurance companies?
The small business owner who has a restaurant, could be said to be in "perpetual fear" of being sued over ice outside of his place, on the sidewalk. He might be "afraid" of a slip-and-trip lawsuit. So do we outlaw lawsuits for this kind of thing? or give business owners "immunity" out of the argument that if we don't, they won't be "comfortable" dispensing services? No, instead, the knowledge that one might be sued for not salting the sidewalk, or trying to take reasonable safety measures, MOTIVATES most persons to then do what is in the best of the public good, and salt or shovel their walkways.
A lawsuit cannot even be brought, for negligence, for a simple honest mistake, at least not as often as it for very serious negligence, as in "any normal and reasonable person would have, and should have, as an adult with normal intelligence and experience in the real world, known."
A lawsuit for intentional infliction of emotional distress is when the act is not merely an "accident" but can be shown to have been deliberately made, in order to knowingly cause the suffering of others, or, knowing that the result would likely result in distress, as a secondary effect.
Restaurant owners, do not get "immunity" from lawsuits. Construction owners, who are responsible for the safety of the roads or buildings we occupy, do not get "immunity". Real Estate agents do not get "immunity". Childcare workers and teachers, some of the most important persons in our society, who are charged with the care of raising and instructing children, do not get "immunity." Janitors do not get "immunity". Food and sanitation workers do not get "immunity". Auto makers, whose work affects the entire population that drives vehicles, and mechanics, do not get "immunity". Soldiers do not get "immunity". Electrical workers and other contractors for public utilities, do not get "immunity." Wall street brokers and traders and mutual funds managers, do not get "immunity".
Until the civil rights reforms of the 60s, The State of Washington sat on a high horse and had "sovereign immunity", which the people decided, was NOT in the best interests of the people. It is wrong, we decided, to allow government workers or the government, to have "immunity" as if they had no accountability.
Still, our Judges receive the benefit of an archaic "immunity" that NO ONE has anymore. Even police and federal prosecutors do not have the kind of immunity that Judges have. Police and prosecutors have what is called a limited immunity, which simply means they have a reasonable amount of protection for mistakes made, if in the course of duty, where it really was not preventable. However, police and prosecutors and others, can still be sued.
When has a Judge been sued last?
When a Judge has the kind of "sovereign immunity" that they are given, it does not simply serve to protect a judge from "error", that is, honest error. What it does, is allow any Judge to be as malicious as they want to be, and get away with not only negligence, but outright intentional infliction of emotional distress. A Judge can knowingly ignore laws of due process, knowing it will harm and traumatize someone, and can railroad right over a disliked person's rights, knowing all the while, that he is completely immune from lawsuit and secure.
Sure, he might have someone down the line call decisions into question, but a Judge has a nice Wonderwall of protection from some of the fellow Judges too.
Isn't it funny, how the case reports "concur that the court erred" on matters such as...gulp...depriving a criminal defendant the right to a public defender, or allowing a defendant to recuse a Judge for prejudice and then ending up in the slammer, or any very basic law violations of due process which any competent Judge is aware of, or should know about? these are true cases...Judges have refused to respect the requests of defendants, to invoke powers of the law which are available.
The cases always read to the effect of "we concur that the court errred" as if these kinds of mistakes are mere err. In the case of Judges, "To err is human but to destroy is divine." I am sure anyone could think of all kinds of sayings that might fit..."To err is human but immunity is divine."
The next King of England, Prince Charles, can be sued. And he has been sued.
But not an American Judge.
If just about everyone can be sued except Judges, wouldn't it seem that the very best job to have, if you're corrupt by nature and want protection for getting away with it, might be as a Judge? It would also seem that certain persons who have the most power and money, might wish to nominate and put into place Judges who will act as the Boss's Enforcer, and keep the crime flow going in the direction of a certain group, whether they're corporate criminals or another kind of mob.
Why not?
We're not stupid.
Are we stupid Americans?
If you need someone in your corner and want to infiltrate to protect your own, wouldn't the main man be The One who is Untouchable?
The only thing a Judge cannot do is kill a person with a weapon or his bare hands in court. Anything else, pretty much goes.
A Judge can effect more harm to the public, to a particular group, or to an individual, than any other person, and if you align a Judge with corrupt public defenders or lawyers and a few bad apples in law enforcement, you have your own personal step-ladder.
First rung, you get the low-level snitch to make a complaint.
Second rung, you get the corrupt officer to be on duty at the same time the snitch makes their complaint
Third rung, you make sure a public defender is assigned who is on your side,
Fourth rung, you make sure to get the Judge you want by knowing their schedule and who takes what kind of cases on what day
This is a strategy that law enforcement can use, if they really have it in for someone, or any gang or set of individuals who "know someone" they feel is in their way and want to do something about it. It is not difficult. Anyone with common sense, who has an adversary they fear, if they are corrupt, could do this.
You can have a "snitch" who lies and makes false claims and set anyone up for false arrest, if desired. By the time that person gets cleared, the intended effects have already been acheived.
Gang rivals can do this, to their advantage in taking control of an area and retaining their jurisdiction, just as easily as corporate criminals or anyone who wants to "get rid of" someone for any reason at all.
The Judge is naturally set up to be the person who will call all the shots and if he or she does a fair job with at least 9 out of 10 cases, to keep up appearances, you just employ the dirty stuff for the one individual, the Jesus Christ, that you really want.
We have Judges in the United States of America who act as sleeper agents for the mafia.
And when I say mafia I include in my definition traditional and non-traditional kinds of groups.
It is not "error" when a Judge intentionally disregards the most basic and commonly understood rules of due process. That is not "error" and the "court" did not then "err". What it is, is an intentional and flagrant disrespect for the laws of the land. Laws that any lawyer, even out of law school, knows, and laws which sometimes even the common layperson knows about and understands. It is not "error" but willful disobedience to the oath one took when sworn into that office to begin with.
I do not believe the public should suffer this kind of abuse by Judges. There should be no "sovereign immunity" for Judges who, if they cannot uphold the basic rules, are either malicious or incompetent.
We have the RIGHT to not have incompetent and malicious Judges affecting the lives of others. Someone who is malicious should not be serving as a Judge of others, because they are unable to weigh both sides and be objective as their job requires. Someone who is incompetent as to the most preliminary basics of due process should not have the job to begin with and should not, and cannot, claim ignorance when they went to 4 years of law school at least, and then had years of practice besides.
Therefore, I would propose that any Judge who fails to honor the laws of due process 3 times in a row, is out.
STRIKE 1: Maybe you forgot. We don't know how in the world you forgot. The law is right here, for anyone to read and we reminded you too, but maybe you wanted to be mean. Okay, mean and unjust Judge, we will forgive you as we the taxpayers pay for the damage you caused by then forcing the defendent to appeal (which costs us money) and maybe go to prison (which costs the taxpayers money). But we will hope there is some explanation and we won't axe you immediately, in case we should happen to discover you have a brain tumor or strokes, or late onset of a severe mental illness or alzheimers.
STRIKE 2: What the HELL is going on Judge? Did you get that psychological evaluation you were supposed to have? Did you have the physical? Are the results in or what? What is UP. Judge, if this happens too close to the last time you "erred" in such a manner, we are going to have to temporarily suspend your bench privileges until you get some things checked out. We don't want to believe you just made the same mistake twice or that you would do this intentionally so we are willing to consider that you may have some extenuating circumstances that are affecting your judgement. Judge, you might think it's a small thing, but you should KNOW that a basic element of due process is allowing the defense to have continuation until they receive discovery or to at least get that discovery at all. Why would you allow the prosecution to proceed without allowing at least even ONE continuance in order to obtain evidence to clear the person of the charges alleged? You refused to allow even ONE continuance when you know this is a right, to be permitted for the good of the defense? We think you're looking sort of gangster, but we might give you one more chance.
STRIKE 3: Sorry Judge. But you know what, you have not only injured citizens of the United States, who we claim as our own by the mandates of the Constitution, you have injured the public confidence. You're also costing us a shitload of money which we the taxpayers, do not want to put into public defenders who don't seem to be doing much good anyway, or jails, when we keep finding out some of these people were innocent to begin with or never had a fair chance from the start. Judge, you had time to get those psych and psychical evals done, and we find no excuse for your behavior. If you are not physically ill, or mentally ill, you are only one of two or three other options--A. deliberately malicious and willing to cause intentional infliction of emotional distress, B., incompetent in the most rudimentary elements of your job, or C., you're easily bought and bribed and do not care about the consequences. Rather than allow you to continue to destroy the public confidence, we are going to retire and remove you before you are able to do greater harm. We DO understand about legal interpretations and how having a different opinion in translation of the law can cause disagreement. We are not going to retire you for this kind of "error". But when you fail to obey the basic, common rules of civil or criminal procedure, when there is no room for "translation" you are out.
I do not propose to let a Judge go for a difference of opinion which a higher court could call "error" but for disrespect for the most basic laws which create the framework of the justice system and ensure due process and equal protection. Any Judge who cannot remember or enforce these basics, should not be in a position to be Judge at all. There is a little more leniency for translation matters, where it's more splitting hairs over whether a tort applies in a certain situation or not. But if the law says one can request a continuance at least ONCE, for example, in order to prove they shouldn't have a charge against them, and then thereafter be set up and trapped by something they shouldn't be entrapped by, there is something wrong with that Judge. A Judge who neglects to tell someone they are going to represent themselves Pro Se and then hangs up on them, refusing them to even allow them a chance to defend themselves and allowing the State to win by default, isn't worth the butter for the bread. Such a Judge is rancid.
Judges should not have sovereign immunity, period. They should not have immunity anymore than the State should have immunity.
This is the United States of America and while we claim democracy and liberty and how we are different from, and better than other countries, and initially, England, it seems the UK is more advanced than the U.S. Well maybe not, if their Judges also have "immunity". The point to America, is that NO man is "King" or is above the law, or "immune" or gets special privileges above anyone else. Yet Judges have the only position in the United States of America, where they can do whatever they want, and be protected. To continue to allow for Judicial Absolute Immunity is setting up the Justice System, as a whole, for failure and for corruption.
I believe there could be a provisional immunity, or limited one, such as police have, in general, but no more than that.
By the way, if the Attorney General's offices of Washington State really cared about public interest, probably Rob McKenna would be promoting THIS idea for saving taxpayer's money and eliminating the deficit. Instead of making a self-protective plea for the State to have "immunity" from lawsuits, he would be promoting something that could really save us all some money--eliminating bad Judges and the costs that are accrued because of them and their poor choices, through abolishing immunity of Judges from lawsuits and holding them accountable to more stringent standards.
*************
This truck just went by with "Nakata Orchards" on the side. One of my Judges has been Judge Alicia Nakata but I don't know if she is connected to orchard money in the area. I've never heard of Nakata orchards.
She is the judge who refused to allow even 1 continuance so I could get my evidence in, to defend myself against a restraining order by State worker Michelle Erickson. I couldn't believe it, and then I was set up by an officer shortly after, to be charged for violating this order. I had tried to put in a motion to terminate the order because of evidence, actually for 2 different matters, and I've never had a response. I listed my address for mail as General Delivery and there has been no mail at the post office.
I have heard a lot of things about Nakata and have always been unwilling to repeat what I've heard. But I was very shocked by her refusal to respect 1 very basic rule and right and she knew it would affect me and be to my detriment and has been.
While the AG offices propose to undo the advances made by civil rights groups, when they successfully abolished "sovereign immunity" in 1961, and while the American Civil Liberties Union seems to be an unsuccessful mitigator in this state, I propose greater advances for the rights of the public. I propose that the outdated protective law of "sovereign immunity" for Judges, is abolished.
The initial point of giving Judges "immunity" from lawsuits, was to enable them to dispense judgement without a fear of, having made an honest mistake, they are sued. It was to prevent them from being "afraid".
This is the same lousy argument that the lobbyists make for protection doctors from lawsuits, claiming their doctors would be "afraid" to practice because if they make an honest mistake, they could get sued.
This has been a powerful and misleading argument made by lobbyists, appealing to emotion rather than reason.
By the same argument, ANY American, in ANY course of business, could be "afraid" of being sued. So when then, are all of the other Americans open to lawsuits for negligence or intentional infliction of emotional distress, but not the especially designated "privileged" who so happen to be "privileged", usually, by the fact that they are backed by huge insurance companies?
The small business owner who has a restaurant, could be said to be in "perpetual fear" of being sued over ice outside of his place, on the sidewalk. He might be "afraid" of a slip-and-trip lawsuit. So do we outlaw lawsuits for this kind of thing? or give business owners "immunity" out of the argument that if we don't, they won't be "comfortable" dispensing services? No, instead, the knowledge that one might be sued for not salting the sidewalk, or trying to take reasonable safety measures, MOTIVATES most persons to then do what is in the best of the public good, and salt or shovel their walkways.
A lawsuit cannot even be brought, for negligence, for a simple honest mistake, at least not as often as it for very serious negligence, as in "any normal and reasonable person would have, and should have, as an adult with normal intelligence and experience in the real world, known."
A lawsuit for intentional infliction of emotional distress is when the act is not merely an "accident" but can be shown to have been deliberately made, in order to knowingly cause the suffering of others, or, knowing that the result would likely result in distress, as a secondary effect.
Restaurant owners, do not get "immunity" from lawsuits. Construction owners, who are responsible for the safety of the roads or buildings we occupy, do not get "immunity". Real Estate agents do not get "immunity". Childcare workers and teachers, some of the most important persons in our society, who are charged with the care of raising and instructing children, do not get "immunity." Janitors do not get "immunity". Food and sanitation workers do not get "immunity". Auto makers, whose work affects the entire population that drives vehicles, and mechanics, do not get "immunity". Soldiers do not get "immunity". Electrical workers and other contractors for public utilities, do not get "immunity." Wall street brokers and traders and mutual funds managers, do not get "immunity".
Until the civil rights reforms of the 60s, The State of Washington sat on a high horse and had "sovereign immunity", which the people decided, was NOT in the best interests of the people. It is wrong, we decided, to allow government workers or the government, to have "immunity" as if they had no accountability.
Still, our Judges receive the benefit of an archaic "immunity" that NO ONE has anymore. Even police and federal prosecutors do not have the kind of immunity that Judges have. Police and prosecutors have what is called a limited immunity, which simply means they have a reasonable amount of protection for mistakes made, if in the course of duty, where it really was not preventable. However, police and prosecutors and others, can still be sued.
When has a Judge been sued last?
When a Judge has the kind of "sovereign immunity" that they are given, it does not simply serve to protect a judge from "error", that is, honest error. What it does, is allow any Judge to be as malicious as they want to be, and get away with not only negligence, but outright intentional infliction of emotional distress. A Judge can knowingly ignore laws of due process, knowing it will harm and traumatize someone, and can railroad right over a disliked person's rights, knowing all the while, that he is completely immune from lawsuit and secure.
Sure, he might have someone down the line call decisions into question, but a Judge has a nice Wonderwall of protection from some of the fellow Judges too.
Isn't it funny, how the case reports "concur that the court erred" on matters such as...gulp...depriving a criminal defendant the right to a public defender, or allowing a defendant to recuse a Judge for prejudice and then ending up in the slammer, or any very basic law violations of due process which any competent Judge is aware of, or should know about? these are true cases...Judges have refused to respect the requests of defendants, to invoke powers of the law which are available.
The cases always read to the effect of "we concur that the court errred" as if these kinds of mistakes are mere err. In the case of Judges, "To err is human but to destroy is divine." I am sure anyone could think of all kinds of sayings that might fit..."To err is human but immunity is divine."
The next King of England, Prince Charles, can be sued. And he has been sued.
But not an American Judge.
If just about everyone can be sued except Judges, wouldn't it seem that the very best job to have, if you're corrupt by nature and want protection for getting away with it, might be as a Judge? It would also seem that certain persons who have the most power and money, might wish to nominate and put into place Judges who will act as the Boss's Enforcer, and keep the crime flow going in the direction of a certain group, whether they're corporate criminals or another kind of mob.
Why not?
We're not stupid.
Are we stupid Americans?
If you need someone in your corner and want to infiltrate to protect your own, wouldn't the main man be The One who is Untouchable?
The only thing a Judge cannot do is kill a person with a weapon or his bare hands in court. Anything else, pretty much goes.
A Judge can effect more harm to the public, to a particular group, or to an individual, than any other person, and if you align a Judge with corrupt public defenders or lawyers and a few bad apples in law enforcement, you have your own personal step-ladder.
First rung, you get the low-level snitch to make a complaint.
Second rung, you get the corrupt officer to be on duty at the same time the snitch makes their complaint
Third rung, you make sure a public defender is assigned who is on your side,
Fourth rung, you make sure to get the Judge you want by knowing their schedule and who takes what kind of cases on what day
This is a strategy that law enforcement can use, if they really have it in for someone, or any gang or set of individuals who "know someone" they feel is in their way and want to do something about it. It is not difficult. Anyone with common sense, who has an adversary they fear, if they are corrupt, could do this.
You can have a "snitch" who lies and makes false claims and set anyone up for false arrest, if desired. By the time that person gets cleared, the intended effects have already been acheived.
Gang rivals can do this, to their advantage in taking control of an area and retaining their jurisdiction, just as easily as corporate criminals or anyone who wants to "get rid of" someone for any reason at all.
The Judge is naturally set up to be the person who will call all the shots and if he or she does a fair job with at least 9 out of 10 cases, to keep up appearances, you just employ the dirty stuff for the one individual, the Jesus Christ, that you really want.
We have Judges in the United States of America who act as sleeper agents for the mafia.
And when I say mafia I include in my definition traditional and non-traditional kinds of groups.
It is not "error" when a Judge intentionally disregards the most basic and commonly understood rules of due process. That is not "error" and the "court" did not then "err". What it is, is an intentional and flagrant disrespect for the laws of the land. Laws that any lawyer, even out of law school, knows, and laws which sometimes even the common layperson knows about and understands. It is not "error" but willful disobedience to the oath one took when sworn into that office to begin with.
I do not believe the public should suffer this kind of abuse by Judges. There should be no "sovereign immunity" for Judges who, if they cannot uphold the basic rules, are either malicious or incompetent.
We have the RIGHT to not have incompetent and malicious Judges affecting the lives of others. Someone who is malicious should not be serving as a Judge of others, because they are unable to weigh both sides and be objective as their job requires. Someone who is incompetent as to the most preliminary basics of due process should not have the job to begin with and should not, and cannot, claim ignorance when they went to 4 years of law school at least, and then had years of practice besides.
Therefore, I would propose that any Judge who fails to honor the laws of due process 3 times in a row, is out.
STRIKE 1: Maybe you forgot. We don't know how in the world you forgot. The law is right here, for anyone to read and we reminded you too, but maybe you wanted to be mean. Okay, mean and unjust Judge, we will forgive you as we the taxpayers pay for the damage you caused by then forcing the defendent to appeal (which costs us money) and maybe go to prison (which costs the taxpayers money). But we will hope there is some explanation and we won't axe you immediately, in case we should happen to discover you have a brain tumor or strokes, or late onset of a severe mental illness or alzheimers.
STRIKE 2: What the HELL is going on Judge? Did you get that psychological evaluation you were supposed to have? Did you have the physical? Are the results in or what? What is UP. Judge, if this happens too close to the last time you "erred" in such a manner, we are going to have to temporarily suspend your bench privileges until you get some things checked out. We don't want to believe you just made the same mistake twice or that you would do this intentionally so we are willing to consider that you may have some extenuating circumstances that are affecting your judgement. Judge, you might think it's a small thing, but you should KNOW that a basic element of due process is allowing the defense to have continuation until they receive discovery or to at least get that discovery at all. Why would you allow the prosecution to proceed without allowing at least even ONE continuance in order to obtain evidence to clear the person of the charges alleged? You refused to allow even ONE continuance when you know this is a right, to be permitted for the good of the defense? We think you're looking sort of gangster, but we might give you one more chance.
STRIKE 3: Sorry Judge. But you know what, you have not only injured citizens of the United States, who we claim as our own by the mandates of the Constitution, you have injured the public confidence. You're also costing us a shitload of money which we the taxpayers, do not want to put into public defenders who don't seem to be doing much good anyway, or jails, when we keep finding out some of these people were innocent to begin with or never had a fair chance from the start. Judge, you had time to get those psych and psychical evals done, and we find no excuse for your behavior. If you are not physically ill, or mentally ill, you are only one of two or three other options--A. deliberately malicious and willing to cause intentional infliction of emotional distress, B., incompetent in the most rudimentary elements of your job, or C., you're easily bought and bribed and do not care about the consequences. Rather than allow you to continue to destroy the public confidence, we are going to retire and remove you before you are able to do greater harm. We DO understand about legal interpretations and how having a different opinion in translation of the law can cause disagreement. We are not going to retire you for this kind of "error". But when you fail to obey the basic, common rules of civil or criminal procedure, when there is no room for "translation" you are out.
I do not propose to let a Judge go for a difference of opinion which a higher court could call "error" but for disrespect for the most basic laws which create the framework of the justice system and ensure due process and equal protection. Any Judge who cannot remember or enforce these basics, should not be in a position to be Judge at all. There is a little more leniency for translation matters, where it's more splitting hairs over whether a tort applies in a certain situation or not. But if the law says one can request a continuance at least ONCE, for example, in order to prove they shouldn't have a charge against them, and then thereafter be set up and trapped by something they shouldn't be entrapped by, there is something wrong with that Judge. A Judge who neglects to tell someone they are going to represent themselves Pro Se and then hangs up on them, refusing them to even allow them a chance to defend themselves and allowing the State to win by default, isn't worth the butter for the bread. Such a Judge is rancid.
Judges should not have sovereign immunity, period. They should not have immunity anymore than the State should have immunity.
This is the United States of America and while we claim democracy and liberty and how we are different from, and better than other countries, and initially, England, it seems the UK is more advanced than the U.S. Well maybe not, if their Judges also have "immunity". The point to America, is that NO man is "King" or is above the law, or "immune" or gets special privileges above anyone else. Yet Judges have the only position in the United States of America, where they can do whatever they want, and be protected. To continue to allow for Judicial Absolute Immunity is setting up the Justice System, as a whole, for failure and for corruption.
I believe there could be a provisional immunity, or limited one, such as police have, in general, but no more than that.
By the way, if the Attorney General's offices of Washington State really cared about public interest, probably Rob McKenna would be promoting THIS idea for saving taxpayer's money and eliminating the deficit. Instead of making a self-protective plea for the State to have "immunity" from lawsuits, he would be promoting something that could really save us all some money--eliminating bad Judges and the costs that are accrued because of them and their poor choices, through abolishing immunity of Judges from lawsuits and holding them accountable to more stringent standards.
*************
This truck just went by with "Nakata Orchards" on the side. One of my Judges has been Judge Alicia Nakata but I don't know if she is connected to orchard money in the area. I've never heard of Nakata orchards.
She is the judge who refused to allow even 1 continuance so I could get my evidence in, to defend myself against a restraining order by State worker Michelle Erickson. I couldn't believe it, and then I was set up by an officer shortly after, to be charged for violating this order. I had tried to put in a motion to terminate the order because of evidence, actually for 2 different matters, and I've never had a response. I listed my address for mail as General Delivery and there has been no mail at the post office.
I have heard a lot of things about Nakata and have always been unwilling to repeat what I've heard. But I was very shocked by her refusal to respect 1 very basic rule and right and she knew it would affect me and be to my detriment and has been.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)