Religious Discrimination & King's Hearings

Probably, more needs to be done about racial discrimination because I read in a local paper that only 12% of black graduating men in TN public school are literate or up to reading level. It was something astonishing. Where they were just being passed from grade to grade and not learning anything.

Then I read the article about King and the hearing on the radical Muslims. What he is thinking or saying may be true. It may be true that many mosques are run by radical Muslim men, perhaps, and it may also be true that they are not giving tips to the U.S. about anything.

However, it is also true that other parties which are connected to religious groups have done the exact same thing...been run by radical persons who are not giving tips to the U.S. about anything, with regard to other crimes and torture.

I read the CNN article about him and the upcoming hearings and then I also read the wiki page about him. He supported the IRA. Which the U.S. only later decided was a terrorist group--that is, American intelligence decided this later. They had all of the Protestant Irish terrorist groups on their list of "do not donate to" but they allowed Americans to freely donate and give money to, and support, the IRA.

From a personal history standpoint, in my family I heard more about free Ireland or right to independence than anything. I still remember feeling sorry for one side when I was a little girl and I remember a specific time when I said, "Why can't they have their own country?" I would also, to this day, support anyone who is unfairly imprisoned, no matter what side they are on.

I still wonder though, why I am personally having such an incredible time here in the U.S., since about the time I had problems with a monastery and sued a division of the Catholic church. I didn't have anyone ever defaming me before this. I was also never falsely accused of crime or reported to police for anything I didn't do, before this time.

So after so many problems, this is what led me to wonder what the U.S. intelligence, justice system, and law enforcement really looks like, on a demographic scale.

I've had people tell me more recently that Ireland's conflicts were not even about religion at all, but about politics but I haven't talked to a lot of the Irish there so I really don't know. I think it's amazing they have established some kind of peace and hope it continues.

But what I found, when I did the research, was that the U.S. has an incredibly high percentage of Roman Catholics and Jewish in these fields, especially in comparison with the average population scale. If you look at the U.S. Supreme Court now, every single judge there is Roman Catholic or Jewish. That's it.

I had earlier, before my son and I started experiencing violence and torture, also noticed that the intelligence fields are heavily scored with those in this group. And when it comes to law and the justice system, the same applies. In the State of Washington, where I was from, I was finding out that even the volunteer legal organizations were all being run by persons coming from these religious groups.

So I guess it would have been great for me and my son if I'd been Catholic or Jewish. I might have had a decent lawyer.

What is crazy to me is the kind of spin that even the media is putting on this, maybe because the power and plutocracy is increasingly controlled by these same groups--the spin is that there is no such thing as religious discrimination in the U.S.

I am a Protestant. If the system is run by good Protestants, Jewish, Catholic, Atheists, and Muslims all working together for good, why have my son and I been screwed over and tortured?
Why do I continue to find those who are in these fields covering up for their buddies?

Almost all of the high ranking intelligence officers and those in the justice system are Roman Catholic. This is not an assumption--it is a fact. Which on one hand, is a remarkable testimony to the fact that Catholics are getting ahead of the discrimination they may have faced themselves in the past. But now, who is being targeted?

In U.S.A. Today just a week or two ago, there was a little demographics chart, like a pie wheel or something, that said something about how over 50% of the majority in the House or Congress were Protestant. U.S.A. Today has no problem pointing out religious demographics with regard to a high percentage of Protestants, but why is the public kept ignorant about who is investigating, surveilling, prosecuting, and defending and making the laws in this country now?

The CIA and the FBI are predominantly being run by those who practice the Roman Catholic faith. And then, from what I hear, they get top intelligence from the Jewish community.

If the U.S. average population is 70% Protestant but the intel and justice system are 30% Protestant, this is a major power shift to a religious group that belongs to the same church. It may be that a hearing should be held on this, and how this is affecting the system and justice for others, if there is also a hearing on how radical Muslim leaders affect America.

It is not radical Muslim leaders who kidnapped MY son. I know for a fact that Al Quaeda did not set ME up in Canada, to be further terrorized and have my son abducted from me and then cover up the whole thing. I also know that it is not Muslim intelligence in the U.S. system, or justice system, that tied up CPS to cover for crime.

A kidnapping has occured, public corruption has occured, fraud, collusion, torture, and I have been falsely arrested a number of times and defamed.

WHO are the terrorists?

Illegal Torture

I haven't had a problem very often with technology use lately since I am not using my own computer after it went down with a virus.

However, this is the second time something has happened at one of the Hilton chains (same place), which is not to say anything about the chain itself but who is, perhaps, running it or knows I might stop by.

Two managers by the names of Andy and Tim were thee and took an interest in me as I was walking in. I used the business center and the burning stuff or a form of technology started up and continued until I left to use the restroom. I felt both Andy and Tim might have Irish background by their eyes, but I get Irish and German mixed up sometimes, with features.

I then noticed a man driving by with plates 137 VRM (TN). I don't know what he does but I wrote the plates down because of an odd expression on his face.

The last time I was at this Duckwood Inn (Nashville, TN), was when I wrote about what was going on while I was there and how there was some Army corp thing of engineers meeting that day when I arrived. I don't know who may have been present today but I did notice that Andy in particular was expecting me.

I'm not putting up with torture of me or my son any longer, and if I see anyone who is anticipating my arrival and then I experience torture of any kind, which is what this is, I am going to document this.

I cannot say these two did anything, but I am only noting they appeared to expect me and then this occured. So someone there, at the time I was there, did something. And it's the second time it's happened at this location. I got up and went to the restroom and it quit and then I left.

bad vibe (different things) & the purple

In the last couple of days, I have noticed a sad or bad vibe in the morning and then at night but not throughout the day. I think it has to do with someone I know and it's not moodiness for me either.

Also, I was in a good mood and then got a bad feeling and the next thing I knew, someone started up the technology stuff. So I think I was sensing someone bad getting close. I am at the library and everything was fine until I was at one spot and other people moved in and then I moved and no problems again.

Basically, no problems on the first floor with anything and then I went to computer #9 and I was sitting there and then got a bad feeling, about someone who was not a good person being close and this feeling came up before anything to do with technology started.

So it was intuitive. I sensed evil.

In general, there ...

I think someone is trying to have me intuit info on P. William or something. I figured out someone already figured out the tie I saw was Williams. I wasn't going to say but then I realized I had accidentally written I hadn't wanted to look up "the article" and that narrows things down to someone who is featured in articles.

So I kicked myself over it last night when I realized and when all these people came into my workplace wearing purple and grinning. Or some of them smirking. (will describe in a minute)

I made another unconscious mistake of wearing this black shirt that looks like one he wore in the chair photo where the homeless guy took it. I kid you not, I did not even register this similiarity at all when I grabbed the shirt.

I got it when I took a bag of clothing and shoes from this closet and I wear black under my workshirt and there were 2 there that were close to my size, a turtleneck and a different shirt with the loops and buttons like his shirt had.

I am only writing about it bc cat's already out of the bag on it, nothing big, just my faux pas. So anyway, I did NOT even think about how it was like his shirt.

What is weird is that I never thought about it at all until I was out of clean black shirts and then wore it under my workshirt and all of a sudden I was at work and looked at the sleeves and realized and thought, "Oh NO." So then I realized why maybe others were staring at me and the sleeves, and somehow I picked up on this but it didn't click until all of a sudden, I made the connection.

So then I was joking around..."Heh heh (cough), yeah, I feel like I'm representing that woman who killed all these people who were scientists...Amy whatever..." (who also had a shirt with the flaps in her mug). I played it off onto her.

I wore this black shirt again yesterday bc I just didn't have anything else to wear. So I was wearing it yesterday and then the day before yesterday.

It was the day before yesterday...Monday I think, that I asked to know what he was wearing, since I have "seen" things in connection with him (I think but not sure) in the past. I think it's mixed up though. So I saw purple. It was such a vivid purple I thought I can't imagine him wearing a whole shirt in that color purple. So I doubted it was right.

Then, at the end of the day, this man who I think was former military or something came in and was wearing a jacket that was cream or light beige and had those flaps on the top (shoulder) and then a purple shirt. I hadn't seen the photo yet, of kate and william, but I only commented on his purple shirt. He wasn't wearing the same shade of purple I saw though. The military man wasn't wearing the exact shade. But I thought, "someone guessed". And then later I randomly came across this photo that was next to a headline which said, "kate and william visit northern ireland" and I didn't see a date but I saw his tie and it was the exact same purple I had seen. So then I was shocked. That I had seen this purple and then too I saw just the top of Kate's jacket (from a small photo bc I didn't want to read the article or know dates or anything...too freaked out) and she had the flaps on her shoulders.

The man who came in with the same color jacket as kate's and with flaps came in on the same day I was wearing the black shirt with flaps on the sleeves. I don't know what else they are called. Loops? I think of them as flaps.

The color purple was the exact same thing I saw though, which is so weird. Because I asked God if he would show me, out of my simple curiosity and I got that color instantly. There was no waiting or anything. Usually I wait and focus or something, but it came the moment I asked and then I doubted it and wondered, "is this the whole shirt? or something in his environment that is this color?"

So very weird.

But maybe there was someone else out there that I have thought about it, in passing or have known, who was also wearing this on that day. How do I know?

I also saw the green glass next to Fergie and the tie color on the same day.

"Boggles the mind" is a phrase someone must use a lot (woman).

So the reason I thought about writing this is that "Australia" came to my mind this morning. I was on Pandora to check it out as my mother mentioned (I've been vetoing auto-selection stations for a long time but decided to try it again today) and was trying to think of passwords and Australia came up and I thought, "Why would I think about Australia?"

And then I got up the nerve to look up "english royalty news" and what came up was prince william and kate to tour australia. Maybe I got it for some other reason but australia wasn't on my mind for any reason.

I also realized yesterday, again, how Philip is from Denmark. I forget this sometimes and I had only made that connection about a year ago, after I had already had Denmark in my mind for some reason, years earlier, when my son was still with me and a baby. I then chose for one of my passwords something about danish tulips (I still have it but don't want to disclose the whole thing specifically but it mentions a number, and something denmark and something tulips). I chose this before my son was born.

Anyway, I really like the worship mix that Pandora is playing. It has a lot of my favorites this morning. Makes me think of my family.

This Morning: What To Give Up For Lent

I saw this article from CNN "what are you giving up for lent?" and I had thought, probably giving up being mean, for some, would do the world a lot more good than giving up meat or whatever. Then I thought I could make a suggestion to any of those who follow lent but have incredibly perjured themselves about me and with regard to my son--how about giving up the cover?

I don't get it.

Maybe someone could explain the Catholic dogma or doctrine to me, since a lot of those people involved in lying about me, specifically in this case with my son, have been Catholic. I understand, first of all, a lot more than some might expect. Traditions, scripture, book of common prayer, and I'm not opposed to religious art and a lot of things others assume Protestants might not "get". I even accept that probably some of the charismatic Catholics and charismatic Protestants might have more in common with eachother than even charismatic Catholics and non-charismatic Catholics might have in common.

Which, by the way, is interesting, and I wonder what kinds of shared experiences with the holy spirit some have had...or not had I guess.

However, what I don't "get", is this thing about confession.

I mean, is anyone even confessing their sins AT ALL?

Does anyone even feel guilty enough to confess what's been done to me and my son? and if so, is this just going to a priest and then thinking that their own personal confession is good enough? without making an attempt to remedy the wrong? or being willing to admit wrong?

If anyone even cares enough to confess, I don't know if they take the part about "forgive us for what we have done and the things we have not done..." The omission of doing the right thing or refusal of correcting the wrong.

I don't know of any place in the scriptures, anywhere, that says your sins will be forgiven if you do things partway. Like, what is convenient for your own self, especially when there is a wrong that remains outstanding.

The picture that comes to my mind is of Jesus on the cross. Or let's just say, anyone on the cross.

You made false statements. You allowed someone who was innocent to be put on a cross. Not just a mother actually, but a child as well. Next to the mother who is on the cross, whether you like the woman or not, is her child, that has been there for several years, since age 1 1/2.

You have gone to church and prayed for your own soul and felt a little guilty maybe, but not enough to go to the right people and confess those statements were false, or to let someone know that the abduction of a child occured and you have personal knowledge about who was involved and how it was done, and then who wanted to cover their tracks. Maybe you had a part in it, maybe you just know about others who had a part in it.

However, if your "sins" or misconduct resulted in the false imprisonment, harassment, and abuse of this mother and child, do you really think Jesus or any higher power is going to forgive you when they "know all" and have before their own eyes, the condition that you put them in, which you are at least partly responsible for.

The "commission" of sin is perhaps what you've asked forgiveness for. But you have left out asking forgiveness for the "omission" of correcting the situation.

And then begins a cycle of just more covering up, more guilt, and more confession, and really, to no avail.

And that is only if some of these people actually really believe, even a little, in what they say they believe in.

Others may claim to have some kind of spiritual connection, but have nothing at all or it's so distorted they think that with violence they are doing a good thing somehow.

I constantly deal with harassment. On an almost daily basis and I'm getting used to it, but last night I stopped to think, out of all the people that deliberately get in my face to mimic or mock me, have I done the same thing to any of them in return?

And I haven't. I can't think of one time where I went out of my way to intentionally provoke anyone.

If anyone has been provoked, I guess, it's because I've tried to stand up for myself and for my son and this is what any mother would do.

As for some of the other religious, I don't know where they come from on things, if they've had a part. I don't know if they think they just accumulate everything for a whole year and then on one special day, hope it gets wiped off the slate, only to continue doing wrong or allowing wrong to continue to persons when they have knowledge.

I don't know what everyone is so afraid of.

I know that there are some things which I know are mine, or my right--inherent things that belong to me and which no "community" can divide or separate or has any right to try to divide or separate. My son, for one thing. These are things to fight for, regardless of what anyone tries to say. It doesn't matter if it's a losing battle to the very end...if it's the right thing to fight for, quitting is wrong. I know for a fact that my son belongs to me. I have also inquired of God if this is right or if there is some alternate "plan". There isn't. That means, that if anyone then gets in the way of this, or tries to put themselves inbetween me and my God and my God's will for my life and my son's life, I am not going to concede, or give up, or compromise. There is NO compromise. I don't care how much money you have, and how many corrupt people you may have on your side, what your resources are, or how bad the paperwork is, that was falsified. I don't care how powerful you are. If you were not aware of the power of God working in my own life, it never would have taken this much to work against me.

There are some other things, from my own perspective, that are "God wills" or God allows which I am learning to try to discern and put away my pride over. Some things I may want but maybe it is not what I want but that for some reason, I am only a cog, and one small part of glorifying God. Whether certain things are big or small, who is to say that pride should determine what happens?

If God wants something to happen, why fight it? Why put yourself, or for me, put myself, in a frame of mind to fight for something or try to force something to occur that is really not for me or for my life, or what God wants?

I am not recommending being a doormat, but David, in the Old Testament, I recently read, was at some stopping place in his battles with his army and a man came out to yell at him and accuse him of bloodshed and disgrace and pelted him with dirt and stones and when one of the soldiers said, "I'll take care of him" David said, "Wait." "How do you know that God has not spoken to him to curse me because of something I've done that's wrong? Let him speak and we will not fight against them." So David and his men were pummeled all the way to the next place where, once they got there, they were exhausted from the travels and being assaulted the whole way.

There is a time and place for everything, and even a time to stop and consider that sometimes God uses people we think are beneath us or who will feel may do our reputations or armor some harm, who are yelling at us because they might have a right to yell.

David did not try to cover up the facts of his wrongdoing. He also did not get out the PR to stop the "talk" from spreading, and he wasn't worried about looking like a pushover or appearing weak. He said "Maybe if we just accept it then God will see this and forgive me and take away the reproach."

For myself, I thought, it's good to remember sometimes, to be humble and always try to check myself on where I'm at and not be too proud for what God wants to say. And for others, who have done me and my son harm, I think this passage corresponds in the sense that instead of covering up crime and trying to make something out to be my fault, or insulting my son by ignoring what has happened to him, and telling me this is a "civil matter", some might need to think about how being accused publicly of crime is humiliating and a harm, but if the shoe fits, and you know this to be true, it might be your turn to walk the Way of the Cross.
****************
And I say this, applying it to others of various faiths who have defamed me and harmed me and my son.

I want an investigation of criminal abduction of my child, and if you choose not to prosecute or charge others, fine. It is, however, your duty to return a child to a mother when the kidnapping was done by fraudulent means. It doesn't matter what "court process" was then began. If I am saying I have facts and evidence to prove this "court process" has been a fraud and wrongful use of taxpayer money, and if my facts and evidence fit the statutes for RICO, then don't disregard this and try to convince me I have a "civil case".

Human trafficking and kidnapping, are not "civil cases".

I don't care if someone tried to tack that part on to make it appear to be a legal process. The underlying actions were criminal and then led to an entire case based on collusion, corruption, and fraud.

And as for the Way of the Cross, there are plenty of people who come from different supposed religious affiliations who are guilty of defaming me. Almost all of the people have been Catholic, but there have been Jewish and Protestants and probably others too.

For example, something as simple as Mykal Holt writing in a document to court that she witnessed me as "psychotic" and holding up a knife in the middle of the night. She claims to be "messianic Jewish"

His Tie

I saw it.

I do not know what is going on, but I saw his tie but I thought it was a whole shirt. It is the exact same shade as what I saw in the "minds eye".

I can't read any articles even if I saw a glimpse of an article. I can't check dates or anything right now.

I am keeping it largely to myself for a good reason and bc I did actually ask God to let me see. I haven't done it for almost half a year, or several months...but I sort of did out of curiosity and then I thought "No, I can't be right" but I saw this color and then thought, "his whole shirt?" or something around him in his environment? but it's the color.

Which is really weird and enough to keep me from wondering again. I got it instantly. But I doubted it was real. I think I doubt bc I don't understand it and then it's very imperfect.

Like today, I was angry as a hornet over the FBI and blocked call stuff, and then I couldn't find a pad of paper anywhere for my server pad and I was so mad I thought to God, or maybe I didn't think at all and was autopilot...thought, in that cupboard inside of that box.

There was one. It was inside the box. But! I try to find stuff all the time and can't. So it's not very dependable.

And then, I think I'm setting myself and my son up to be experimented with more and I demand!!! the return of my son to MY CARE or we are OUT of here. Having a job is at least something normal I've been deprived of for a long time. But my SON is huge. And I am trying to give the right people time to get to my report, but too much time has gone by for me to be very satisfied with waiting long. I want him back as soon as possible.

FBI Call and Then Phone Problems

I got another email from this lawyer and I'm not opening it bc it will only upset me before work. I'll open it later, when I have time to cool down after whatever it's about. The only time she's tried to call me has been once when I was at work and I ignored it or emailed her and said I could not take calls at work. I had a feeling it would be emotional and I wasn't going to mix that with work.

I made the stupid mistake of reading her mail before work this morning and launched into my call with FBI in D.C., asking how long until someone responds to a complaint if a complaint is made. It was some woman who was later interjected by a man, at before 11 a.m. Around 10:30 or so. They asked me all these questions and then said my report about my son being abducted was 'civil' in nature and not criminal. Right.

I said it is criminal that underlies what exists that is civil and the criminal conduct needs to be investigated and addressed. If this whole case is a FRAUD, one does not file a civil suit to claim one's civil rights are harmed if the criminal FRAUD and kidnapping can be PROVEN. If this whole thing is a fraud, perpetuated by CRIME, then there is NO CASE AGAINST me that is even legitimate at all. It's a lie. Criminal violations need to be investigated, and this is the root of the problem and if it is true my son was abducted not by a mistake of application of laws but by DELIBERATE ILLEGAL methods, and then covered up, then it is CRIME and I have the right to have my son returned to me at once and ANY and all failure by any responsible U.S. agency to do so, will be viewed as further criminal collusion.

These 2 were telling me to go to Washington state FBI. Oh right. Where all the good agents are...in Seattle field offices. Yeah, you sure have me convinced! 3 toilets full of blood and one major loss of my singing voice and a FRICKING burnt tongue later.

I said no, when some of the agents are guilty of being involved, they are NOT the group to go to. But these FBI receptionists (who were more than receptionists or they wouldn't have been tag-teaming my call ahead of time), were trying to shift a major criminal case over to the same place where things are NUTS.

Right after this phone call with the D.C. offices, I had almost every single call that I tried to make obstructed. My cell phone was being blocked from making any calls to any party, and I was trying to contact the embassy for another country to get information about the UN telephone number overseas because I want to speak to them directly.

If the U.S. continues to hold my son hostage under legal auspices, and refuses to investigate CRIME, not "civil rights violations" but CRIME, then this is going to the UN.

I want to give a reasonable amount of time for someone to respond first though, so that's why I had called this morning...to find out how long I should expect to wait.

I wrote down and took notes of all the cell phone problems I started having after this call with the D.C. FBI.

I kept trying to call and I was getting a whole schmorgashbord of problems. "The number you have called is no longer listed" as if it was the wrong number. Then, I confirmed the number and my calls kept getting cut off so they were somehow being disconnected before I be connected. Then, I even had a charge applied to my attempt to make a call and the call was disconnected before it ever started ringing. It kept saying "call ended". I also had the volume somehow turned up louder than is really possible on my phone. My phone is (or was) on high volume and somehow, at one point it was turned up so loud it hurt my ear.

So I texted the embassy I was trying to reach, because my cell phone was being denied service for any kind of communications. I checked to see if it was all numbers, or just numbers trying to reach consulates or embassies. It was the later I think because I then dialed my parent's number and it was going through but I disconnected it because I only wanted to know why my other calls were not going through. I even finally had 411 connect me directly and it would go through and then get dropped before anyone could answer the phone.

These people act like just because time has passed, no crime has been committed.

Crime was committed and it's only that I recently discovered it is actually CRIME. I was prevented from even getting enough discovery to make this allegation or accusation at all. And then, I tried to line things up through this appeals lawyer, and she's not doing anything. And I knew I had no chance in lining anything up without having a safety deposit box or money for one, because the U.S. was freely allowing all of my personal papers, documents, and even photos, all the way to my childhood, to be stolen from me.

I just got my safety deposit box. So then I had a place to put proof of my submission of reports that I have actually already made at times, in part to a few U.S. agencies.

The next step is to wait and expect a reply and contact for investigation of illegal kidnapping/abduction of a child, fraud, public corruption, collusion, and reaaaally,

The U.S. does NOT want this to go to the UN because if it does, I will throw in a few other allegations I am not even mentioning in my domestic U.S. reports, and it won't be pretty.

Out of KINDNESS to those who have tortured me and my son, I have instead provided for a way out, that is certaintly more decent than anything they would get before an international court.

I know the distinction between "criminal" and "civil" and while I may have a civil case, I am not addressing this at this time. I am addressing and making reports of CRIME and I expect to be contacted by those who take such reports.

These D.C. FBI offices were basically receptionist-lawyers that sounded like all they wanted was their own discovery to protect nobody but themselves. "Do you know who did it? do you know who the "Washington authorities" were?"

That's what they wanted to know.

They wanted to know if I knew what THEY already FRICKING know and continue to conceal from the public.

I am having to look up FOIA laws again. It looks like the first case I would file, if I have to file one, would be to compel the FOIA that I requested before my son was even taken from me.

I get upset with the whole FBI in general, but really, it is still the same DUMB ones that are holding back and holding up anyone who is good and decent.

What they SHOULD have been asking me is this:

"Do you know who the dumb people are? Do you have the names of the dumb ones?"

Tanesha Canzater

This lawyer that was appointed to me is sounding more and more unethical.

She has not communicated with me at all, hardly at all, for over a YEAR that she took this case, and then she pushed it right up to the deadline and then wanted to back out and cancel after I told her it was not acceptable to me to just decide on something without talking about it first.

She wrote "you have talked and talked and talked and you have not listened."

I have a few emails from her (less than 10 and short and not descriptive) and had about 5 very short conversations with her over the phone total, most of them lasting 5 minutes, and of 2 that were longer, they were a long time ago and lasted about 20 minutes and were about generalities.

I asked her from the very beginning, when she refused to obtain records I needed, if she thought she should withdraw because of a conflict of interest. She used language and made some comments that sounded like they were straight from the desk of Bullivant Houser Bailey. I thought, "There is something not right here."

Then, I waited, because I don't like to judge but my intuition was kicking in so I asked where she went to college.

She is an African American woman who was raised in Washington D.C. or has some kind of contacts there. I don't know about raised there, but lives there PT now or works there. She went to a Catholic Benedictine Order college and a Baptist college. Why both, I don't know.

She stalled on getting any records and then wouldn't even obtain them and then she was refusing to communicate with me at all. She sent me email, out of all the email she sent, it was only a few notes, and CYA email. Then she was making all these extensions and I didn't even know about and wanted to talk about it. She proposed her ideas for the first time ever, yesterday, for making appeal for this case.

That's just a couple of days before her deadline to file the appeal is up. I said I wanted to talk to her about it and she sent me back an email saying, "you talked and talked and talked and i've listened".

I am wondering when I "talked and talked and talked" as she mocked me as having done, because I have had maybe 5 phone conversations with her total, and all under 20 minutes and usually about 10 minutes or so. One may have been longer. The rest of the time, I was trying to get ahold of her by email or phone.

I told her I didn't agree with her idea (given to me at the last minute) of making me sound incompetent before for grounds for appeal, and had other ideas, or spins on it.

She then wrote back a note saying she was withdrawing because she is claiming the only way to get appeal is to, basically, make ME look bad and put me at fault, when this would not be the "truth".

The "truth" that everyone is apparently SO interested in.

I want a criminal investigation on what has happened NOW. I mean, on the original crimes that were committed, and the ongoing attempts to COVER UP what has been done.

I wrote to Tanesha saying I did not want this appeal dismissed nor did I want her to withdraw, I had sent some questions and wanted to DISCUSS the grounds for appeal, and in my email I had told her she hadn't even talked to me about what the real facts were.

So how does she know, if she is not even communicating with her client?

It's like she just wanted to do someone a favor and put a bad spin on me and not even discuss anything with me...stringing this out to the last minute while my son's medical statutes are expiring, and she and whoever is guiding her in decision-making, knows this.

There is Bullivant Houser Bailey all over this.