. Is anyone else having a problem with this pmcdomald@secstate.wa.gov email address? Because my attempt to send an email has been blocked by Seattle, WA's webmaster. I wrote to the International Trade section for Secretary of State because I need to know the name of the person in charge of the Seattle, WA branch of The Department of State. As I was trying to find this, I saw slide after slide of missions trips by The State of Washington to India. You know, Eastern India, the same place Leon Panetta visited for support and a big deal. So anyway, I'm finding a Seattle address on 2nd Street, but no name. The elusive Department of State. Well, I don't think it's a secret.
I wrote to the Seattle Mayor's offices, Patty Murray, and Gregoire, all to ask the simple question of who the person in charge of the Seattle branch for Dept. of State is.
I'll let you know when I find out.
Monday, August 29, 2011
Stolen Password, Ruined Printer, Govt. Stolen Library Card
Oh sure no one cares about me and what I'm saying.
That must be why someone just stole my password from my only email account that I use, and did this in the last 10 minutes, after I made the post about the FBI and RICO of the FBI.
I guess I could always ask my forensic computer friend to find out for me, if he can, who did this.
Finally, supposedly, now it's not just a printer that's missing from my mom's computer, but her workplace printer is said to be acting up. So why should all the printers that I might use for printing out a motion about withheld evidence suddenly be gone?
Suddenly, after I wrote about my password being taken, someone decided not to mess around anymore and I got it back.
It was a few weeks ago, after someone had been in my place, they stole my library card from my pants pocket. I had jeans hung up and they took the library card I had there. I had checked out one book.
My parents would have no reason to steal my library card.
So who took it? library lady who was driving by last time? Irene?
Who would want a library card anyway?
How funny that I had all the problems on the library computers after this card was stolen. I had my library card stolen from my house. 100% positive. It was in my jeans pocket with 2 other cards and I had just been to the library the day before. So I went to get my card to look something up online with it, and it was gone. The other 2 cards were still there. No one was in my place unless they got in when I wasn't there, without my consent.
I was trying to be a surrogate at that time and had different contacts with agencies.
But the U.S. government wanted to interfere, didn't they?
So this is what happened. Right after my library card was stolen, it was passed on to someone with a lot of computer experience and knowledge. Not just a little, a LOT. And this person had access to the Coquille library computers.
The next time I went to the Coquille library, I didn't have my card. I asked the librarian to write it out for me on a piece of paper. They did and then I tried to use it for signing up to one of the library computers there and look up my surrogate stuff. I had several different alternative emails for privacy.
It didn't matter which computer I went to in the library. I would sign off on one and go to another one...Every single attempt I made to get onto a computer, and I tried 4 or 5 different ones, was being intercepted and monitored by someone who had access to all of the library computers.
Hello FBI. What do you guys think? military too? or just FBI?
I knew I felt police vibes in my place. I knew it.
So it wasn't just something that one person could do. The group that was messing with me was so
DOJ
It was DOJ computer people
sophisticated enough to not only be able to be on any computer in the entire library that I was trying to use, but they were also accessing the surrogate sites I was accessing and in some cases, they were going onto the message boards and limiting how many parents I could view, and for most of the sites, they were blocking my ability to go to the site at all. I went to a ton of different sites, which I'd had access to before. And then, all of my normal communications with some of the parents disappeared as well. I was no longer getting emails. Someone or a group was blocking my ability to even get emails from potential parents.
At this Coquille library, you get 1 hour on their computers. That's it.
I had so many problems with someone messing with me, that I was signing off from one computer, to then enter my ID number (which was displayed on my library card that was stolen) on another computer. So I would spend 10 minutes on one, and then move to a different one. At some point, I tried using 2 at the same time. I stayed on one computer and then moved to the other computer to enter my number and try to get onto the other one, by "appearing" that was still using the first one. It didn't work.
It didn't work because whoever stole my library card, had my ID number right there on the card. It's not hidden. It's printed right there. And this is the number you have to use to sign up for a computer.
So whoever stole my library card not only accessed my private home, which had been locked, they then used my card to pass it on to some other group that was able to watch all of the Coquille library computers at the same time.
And they deliberately obstructed all of my free will attempts and efforts to be a surrogate mother for a family. They interferred with every single agency I went to, blocked my emails, gained discovery and access to what email accounts I used, and made it impossible for me to be a surrogate and then they began using technology on me again over here. Someone wanted to block my ability to be a surrogate, and then they started torturing me so I'd talk about it and people wouldn't even want to use me as a surrogate. These people don't want me to have any money, and they have repeatedly used me for research, against my will. I don't even think the recent torture is about research. I think it was to prompt me to talk about what was going on again and then prevent me from making between $20,000-$60,000 as a surrogate. I had a family that was interested at the higher levels. All of my normal prospectives totally disappeared after someone stole my library card. First someone started messing with my wifi at my place and they were using it for discovery. Then they used my library card ID to do large scale harassment and interference.
I'm sure John and Linda aren't involved.
I will go back and erase my swear words for a few of the Mormons who have been reading my posts.
Hows that?
It was on that day that I went up to the librarian and asked what their policies were for The Patriot Act and allowing someone to monitor ones online or library activities.
That must be why someone just stole my password from my only email account that I use, and did this in the last 10 minutes, after I made the post about the FBI and RICO of the FBI.
I guess I could always ask my forensic computer friend to find out for me, if he can, who did this.
Finally, supposedly, now it's not just a printer that's missing from my mom's computer, but her workplace printer is said to be acting up. So why should all the printers that I might use for printing out a motion about withheld evidence suddenly be gone?
Suddenly, after I wrote about my password being taken, someone decided not to mess around anymore and I got it back.
It was a few weeks ago, after someone had been in my place, they stole my library card from my pants pocket. I had jeans hung up and they took the library card I had there. I had checked out one book.
My parents would have no reason to steal my library card.
So who took it? library lady who was driving by last time? Irene?
Who would want a library card anyway?
How funny that I had all the problems on the library computers after this card was stolen. I had my library card stolen from my house. 100% positive. It was in my jeans pocket with 2 other cards and I had just been to the library the day before. So I went to get my card to look something up online with it, and it was gone. The other 2 cards were still there. No one was in my place unless they got in when I wasn't there, without my consent.
I was trying to be a surrogate at that time and had different contacts with agencies.
But the U.S. government wanted to interfere, didn't they?
So this is what happened. Right after my library card was stolen, it was passed on to someone with a lot of computer experience and knowledge. Not just a little, a LOT. And this person had access to the Coquille library computers.
The next time I went to the Coquille library, I didn't have my card. I asked the librarian to write it out for me on a piece of paper. They did and then I tried to use it for signing up to one of the library computers there and look up my surrogate stuff. I had several different alternative emails for privacy.
It didn't matter which computer I went to in the library. I would sign off on one and go to another one...Every single attempt I made to get onto a computer, and I tried 4 or 5 different ones, was being intercepted and monitored by someone who had access to all of the library computers.
Hello FBI. What do you guys think? military too? or just FBI?
I knew I felt police vibes in my place. I knew it.
So it wasn't just something that one person could do. The group that was messing with me was so
DOJ
It was DOJ computer people
sophisticated enough to not only be able to be on any computer in the entire library that I was trying to use, but they were also accessing the surrogate sites I was accessing and in some cases, they were going onto the message boards and limiting how many parents I could view, and for most of the sites, they were blocking my ability to go to the site at all. I went to a ton of different sites, which I'd had access to before. And then, all of my normal communications with some of the parents disappeared as well. I was no longer getting emails. Someone or a group was blocking my ability to even get emails from potential parents.
At this Coquille library, you get 1 hour on their computers. That's it.
I had so many problems with someone messing with me, that I was signing off from one computer, to then enter my ID number (which was displayed on my library card that was stolen) on another computer. So I would spend 10 minutes on one, and then move to a different one. At some point, I tried using 2 at the same time. I stayed on one computer and then moved to the other computer to enter my number and try to get onto the other one, by "appearing" that was still using the first one. It didn't work.
It didn't work because whoever stole my library card, had my ID number right there on the card. It's not hidden. It's printed right there. And this is the number you have to use to sign up for a computer.
So whoever stole my library card not only accessed my private home, which had been locked, they then used my card to pass it on to some other group that was able to watch all of the Coquille library computers at the same time.
And they deliberately obstructed all of my free will attempts and efforts to be a surrogate mother for a family. They interferred with every single agency I went to, blocked my emails, gained discovery and access to what email accounts I used, and made it impossible for me to be a surrogate and then they began using technology on me again over here. Someone wanted to block my ability to be a surrogate, and then they started torturing me so I'd talk about it and people wouldn't even want to use me as a surrogate. These people don't want me to have any money, and they have repeatedly used me for research, against my will. I don't even think the recent torture is about research. I think it was to prompt me to talk about what was going on again and then prevent me from making between $20,000-$60,000 as a surrogate. I had a family that was interested at the higher levels. All of my normal prospectives totally disappeared after someone stole my library card. First someone started messing with my wifi at my place and they were using it for discovery. Then they used my library card ID to do large scale harassment and interference.
I'm sure John and Linda aren't involved.
I will go back and erase my swear words for a few of the Mormons who have been reading my posts.
Hows that?
It was on that day that I went up to the librarian and asked what their policies were for The Patriot Act and allowing someone to monitor ones online or library activities.
RICO: RICOLA advertisement (FBI)
First thing I listened to this morning was a Ricola ad. It's from "Fallout from Slander."
Well, first I was thinking about a RICO lawsuit and my Ex. Then I had the idea to go to a Ricola ad.
I'm watching it over and over...and then I'm finding another one! Hm. Naw, this one is perfect.
After I file my RICO lawsuit, I might ask, "Well, didn't you have a good time though? It was a good "experience" for you, wasn't it?"
Hello Washington D.C. FBI Headquarters. You are guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors.
Not only can I get you for crime and collusion, I can get you for gross defamation and torture.
What's funny, is that I remember playing this ad back in 2007. I think that was before I knew what it meant.
Well, first I was thinking about a RICO lawsuit and my Ex. Then I had the idea to go to a Ricola ad.
I'm watching it over and over...and then I'm finding another one! Hm. Naw, this one is perfect.
After I file my RICO lawsuit, I might ask, "Well, didn't you have a good time though? It was a good "experience" for you, wasn't it?"
Hello Washington D.C. FBI Headquarters. You are guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors.
Not only can I get you for crime and collusion, I can get you for gross defamation and torture.
What's funny, is that I remember playing this ad back in 2007. I think that was before I knew what it meant.
Sunday, August 28, 2011
Subscribed to Fighting CPS--Suing WA State
I'm back to looking up laws for withheld evidence and subscribing to groups that fight CPS.
I have to file something next week, regarding the State's withholding and suppression of evidence that was crucial to my case.
I already know without any doubt that I am suing. If this case is not overturned and they don't return my child, I'm suing the State, the FBI (including my Ex boyfriend), the military (if I have to), Department of State, AG, and CPS.
Most likely I would be required to sue in federal court and I could use withholding evidence as the premise, or obstruction, but in that case, it would just be better to sue them under RICO. They committed crimes, they should pay for crimes. Treble.
And that would also include medical professionals who altered records and used state guardianship as a way to keep my son from being able to collect compensation for damages in childbirth.
As long as damages continue to acrue, I have a running statute. Which means if I find out another piece of evidence was withheld, or I make even the smallest discovery down the road, this will run my statute for RICO so that it doesn't expire.
I don't care who I have to sue. It really does not matter to me in the least. I'll do what I have to do, and I have no regard for the 'feelings' of anyone.
Who stood up and spoke up for me and my son when we were being tortured?
So, finding out about discovery later, is only going to make me liable to sue at a later date, when I'm better prepared, after I've made some money.
Basically, it can be done the more discreet way, through overturning the case now, or it will be a big blow-out.
And the mental illness claim is not going to go far after I get some other countries involved in a UN claim or get some other informants first.
What mental illness wrongful claim will do, is prove deliberate and malicious obstruction of justice by the U.S. military and government.
I have to file something next week, regarding the State's withholding and suppression of evidence that was crucial to my case.
I already know without any doubt that I am suing. If this case is not overturned and they don't return my child, I'm suing the State, the FBI (including my Ex boyfriend), the military (if I have to), Department of State, AG, and CPS.
Most likely I would be required to sue in federal court and I could use withholding evidence as the premise, or obstruction, but in that case, it would just be better to sue them under RICO. They committed crimes, they should pay for crimes. Treble.
And that would also include medical professionals who altered records and used state guardianship as a way to keep my son from being able to collect compensation for damages in childbirth.
As long as damages continue to acrue, I have a running statute. Which means if I find out another piece of evidence was withheld, or I make even the smallest discovery down the road, this will run my statute for RICO so that it doesn't expire.
I don't care who I have to sue. It really does not matter to me in the least. I'll do what I have to do, and I have no regard for the 'feelings' of anyone.
Who stood up and spoke up for me and my son when we were being tortured?
So, finding out about discovery later, is only going to make me liable to sue at a later date, when I'm better prepared, after I've made some money.
Basically, it can be done the more discreet way, through overturning the case now, or it will be a big blow-out.
And the mental illness claim is not going to go far after I get some other countries involved in a UN claim or get some other informants first.
What mental illness wrongful claim will do, is prove deliberate and malicious obstruction of justice by the U.S. military and government.
Haldol and Other Drug Residual
I just noticed I am still having reactions from the Haldol they gave me. I'm not kidding. I don't think it's from more recent dosing, though since my hair just fell out today, or came out, in large handfuls, I'm getting rid of a lot of the things I had opened in my place.
People were coming into my place when I wasn't there, and that's a fact. So I'm going to have to throw some things out.
Aside from my hair coming out in handfuls, I haven't had droopy eyes or anything, but it's very strange that I'm still having the scaling I got, out of the blue, from Haldol in TN almost 6 months ago.
After they mass dosed me and almost killed me, I ended up with this very large rough and thickened skin scale-y patch by my tailbone. I read later it's a side effect from Haldol. So it went away but then I was injected again, with something, when I was in Knoxville, TN and they didn't even bother to tell me what it was. They injected me in my arm and I had a huge welt for the longest time, so I don't know what that was.
I basically think I'm going to have to do another detox. I just did one, but I screwed it up or something. I think this old patch is the same spot, but why it's there is a little odd. And I haven't had anything at anyone's place recently.
I am going to throw out all my condiments and just buy things single serving I guess. I think it's just residual, but I don't know for sure.
People were coming into my place when I wasn't there, and that's a fact. So I'm going to have to throw some things out.
Aside from my hair coming out in handfuls, I haven't had droopy eyes or anything, but it's very strange that I'm still having the scaling I got, out of the blue, from Haldol in TN almost 6 months ago.
After they mass dosed me and almost killed me, I ended up with this very large rough and thickened skin scale-y patch by my tailbone. I read later it's a side effect from Haldol. So it went away but then I was injected again, with something, when I was in Knoxville, TN and they didn't even bother to tell me what it was. They injected me in my arm and I had a huge welt for the longest time, so I don't know what that was.
I basically think I'm going to have to do another detox. I just did one, but I screwed it up or something. I think this old patch is the same spot, but why it's there is a little odd. And I haven't had anything at anyone's place recently.
I am going to throw out all my condiments and just buy things single serving I guess. I think it's just residual, but I don't know for sure.
Music and Sermons
I watched the music video "Heaven" by Bryan Adams, then "Fields of Gold" by Eva Cassidy and sang along, and then decided to look up a sermon. So I went to a site for free sermons and I have never heard of these people, but I chose a sermon in Spanish. It's "Maldicion Autoimpuesta" con testimonio with Viviana y Fernando. I think it was posted on August 22, 2011. I guess it's about "self inflicted damnation" and some testimonies of people who went through this? I have no idea. I'm sure there is a message for someone out there, but since it's not in my language, I guess it's not for me. :) So, for those who get something out of it, there you are. I guess next I'll find a sermon in my language.
I will post the link above. I don't understand what they're talking about, but listening anyway.
I decided, after praying, to look up something for me to be able to read, from Edgar Cayce, so I typed in "Edgar Cayce's sermons" . So I read something from him about how we are part angel, and the angel-self is always before the throne of God.
The sun just now broke through the clouds for the first time all day.
From John Van Auken (mysticycism, The Presence):
We are physical, earthly beings, but within us is a godling, a bound angel, a sleeping beauty, seeking to be reborn, reawakened. The Edgar Cayce records speak of the part of us that is the angel, and that this angel-self is ever before the throne of God (1646-1). This godly part of us was lost during the descent but will be reborn on "the rising" or ascent.
"Then, as the guardian influence or angel is ever before the face of the Father, through same may that influence ever speak.... Yes, through thy angel, through thy SELF that IS the angel, does the self speak with thy Ideal!" (Cayce reading 1646-1).
And then I went to something that had more text from Cayce and it's called:
Return of the Phoenix: The Veil
Then it goes to Book Two: The Great Break-Up
and there is nothing from that at all. No text. So I need a different sermon. Okay, I got one.
I went to Katherine Kuhlman and I chose one that was entitled: "Mental Attitude"
I am listening to this one, for me, today. http://kathrynkuhlman.com/audio_files.html
So far, she's talking about how the only limitation to what God can do, is our mental attitude about what we have faith to expect.
I do disagree with her statement about "have you noticed that the higher on the scale you go, of people, the nicer they are?"
And I totally disagree with that. She is not in keeping with the real world there. People are sometimes very "nice" by all outward appearances and external words when they are at the "top" because they have nothing testing them. Job, in the Bible, was not saying nice things, nor was David in the caves, or others, when they were at the bottom of the "social order" or being persecuted.
So I guess this is turning into a sermon for me to think about and criticize. She is right about how people who are mean, and do mean deeds have something wrong with them.
But when she talks about "suspicious" people, I hear this from such a different standpoint. Because there is "suspicious" as in mean spirited suspicion and then there is "right" suspicion when someone is, for example, being tortured.
So she says again, at the end, and I totally disagree with her here...
She claims that people at the top are not "nice" because they have jobs at the top, she claims they got their top jobs because they were "nice".
Sorry Katherine, that's B.S.
I was extremely nice and sweet to everyone until after years of being harassed, stalked, having my supporters tortured and murdered, and then being tortured along with MY SON.
Real persecution brings out real and true suspicion, for good reason.
I think Katherine is wanting to partly toot her own horn here. It's very easy for people who were...there we go...yes, now she's talking about herself and what kind of person she is "really" like. This is hilarious.
What is Katherine really like? she sounds very self-righteous and makes no mention about how many of the "top positions" of others are not because of how "nice" they are, but because of who has the most money and is willing to kill for the top position. It's easy to smile and be pleasant and sound concerned when you have a posse that is killing on your behalf to put you where you are.
Take, for example, the Native Americans. They were "nice". They were very hospitable to the white settlers. And did they get to "the top" because they were the nicest people? No, the nicest people never make it to the top, because the mediocre folks are always mean enough to tear them down and be jealous over geniunely nice people. It is TRUE that you "catch more flies with honey" but is this geniune kindness or is this just shrewd willingness to do what it takes to catch those flies? Some people are willing to put on any kind of face or act, and bite their tongue, to get what they want. And others get penalized for being honest.
I think the "nice" people and the "honest" people are sometimes not one-and-the-same. Sometimes they are and sometimes they're not. But from what I've seen, people like to take the truly nice or kind people who are talented, and out of spite and jealousy, work on them for years with abuse in order to turn them from "nice dogs" to "mean dogs" or what appears to be mean when it's a developed self-defense mechanism that must be employed to save their own lives and keep them sane.
It has nothing to do with nice people going to the top.
In America, it is a proven fact that some of the meanest people alive are at the top, and they portray themselves as "nice" because they have what they want and they can afford to pay other people to kill and be "mean" for them in order to keep up their own appearance of innocence and goodness.
The groups that are willing to promote an individual or family, to a top position or higher position, have no interest at all in how genuinely "nice" the family is. They elevate them for their own political reasons and nothing else.
What really happens to truly nice people is the tragedy. They seem to always get usurped by the pretenders. I think it is a rare miracle that truly nice people get to the top. And if they do, I think even there, if they are truly nice, some group is always working at them to tear them down and then feeling jubilant when the person displays a self-defensive so-called "mean streak".
*************
I watched "The Negotiator". It started with a preview of a movie with the words "Execute them!" Sounds like the U.S. to me. They don't like what someone has to say and it's "execute them," right? I saw this clip with Obama and the Homeland Security woman, giving a speech at 5 p.m. their time. Noticed the Department of State flag, neatly folded to display the "arrows of war" instead of the olive branch. Like that's a suprise. This government has tried to destroy my entire family with their "arrows". No, that's not true. It has allowed specific groups to make the attempt, by abusing government channels. Which hitman decided he couldn't "take the shot" at me?
Why doesn't someone just prepare to do the right thing and return my son. There is no other solution. Nothing else makes sense, nothing else is going to accomplish peace, and nothing else is morally or legally justified.
I will post the link above. I don't understand what they're talking about, but listening anyway.
I decided, after praying, to look up something for me to be able to read, from Edgar Cayce, so I typed in "Edgar Cayce's sermons" . So I read something from him about how we are part angel, and the angel-self is always before the throne of God.
The sun just now broke through the clouds for the first time all day.
From John Van Auken (mysticycism, The Presence):
We are physical, earthly beings, but within us is a godling, a bound angel, a sleeping beauty, seeking to be reborn, reawakened. The Edgar Cayce records speak of the part of us that is the angel, and that this angel-self is ever before the throne of God (1646-1). This godly part of us was lost during the descent but will be reborn on "the rising" or ascent.
"Then, as the guardian influence or angel is ever before the face of the Father, through same may that influence ever speak.... Yes, through thy angel, through thy SELF that IS the angel, does the self speak with thy Ideal!" (Cayce reading 1646-1).
And then I went to something that had more text from Cayce and it's called:
Return of the Phoenix: The Veil
Then it goes to Book Two: The Great Break-Up
and there is nothing from that at all. No text. So I need a different sermon. Okay, I got one.
I went to Katherine Kuhlman and I chose one that was entitled: "Mental Attitude"
I am listening to this one, for me, today. http://kathrynkuhlman.com/audio_files.html
So far, she's talking about how the only limitation to what God can do, is our mental attitude about what we have faith to expect.
I do disagree with her statement about "have you noticed that the higher on the scale you go, of people, the nicer they are?"
And I totally disagree with that. She is not in keeping with the real world there. People are sometimes very "nice" by all outward appearances and external words when they are at the "top" because they have nothing testing them. Job, in the Bible, was not saying nice things, nor was David in the caves, or others, when they were at the bottom of the "social order" or being persecuted.
So I guess this is turning into a sermon for me to think about and criticize. She is right about how people who are mean, and do mean deeds have something wrong with them.
But when she talks about "suspicious" people, I hear this from such a different standpoint. Because there is "suspicious" as in mean spirited suspicion and then there is "right" suspicion when someone is, for example, being tortured.
So she says again, at the end, and I totally disagree with her here...
She claims that people at the top are not "nice" because they have jobs at the top, she claims they got their top jobs because they were "nice".
Sorry Katherine, that's B.S.
I was extremely nice and sweet to everyone until after years of being harassed, stalked, having my supporters tortured and murdered, and then being tortured along with MY SON.
Real persecution brings out real and true suspicion, for good reason.
I think Katherine is wanting to partly toot her own horn here. It's very easy for people who were...there we go...yes, now she's talking about herself and what kind of person she is "really" like. This is hilarious.
What is Katherine really like? she sounds very self-righteous and makes no mention about how many of the "top positions" of others are not because of how "nice" they are, but because of who has the most money and is willing to kill for the top position. It's easy to smile and be pleasant and sound concerned when you have a posse that is killing on your behalf to put you where you are.
Take, for example, the Native Americans. They were "nice". They were very hospitable to the white settlers. And did they get to "the top" because they were the nicest people? No, the nicest people never make it to the top, because the mediocre folks are always mean enough to tear them down and be jealous over geniunely nice people. It is TRUE that you "catch more flies with honey" but is this geniune kindness or is this just shrewd willingness to do what it takes to catch those flies? Some people are willing to put on any kind of face or act, and bite their tongue, to get what they want. And others get penalized for being honest.
I think the "nice" people and the "honest" people are sometimes not one-and-the-same. Sometimes they are and sometimes they're not. But from what I've seen, people like to take the truly nice or kind people who are talented, and out of spite and jealousy, work on them for years with abuse in order to turn them from "nice dogs" to "mean dogs" or what appears to be mean when it's a developed self-defense mechanism that must be employed to save their own lives and keep them sane.
It has nothing to do with nice people going to the top.
In America, it is a proven fact that some of the meanest people alive are at the top, and they portray themselves as "nice" because they have what they want and they can afford to pay other people to kill and be "mean" for them in order to keep up their own appearance of innocence and goodness.
The groups that are willing to promote an individual or family, to a top position or higher position, have no interest at all in how genuinely "nice" the family is. They elevate them for their own political reasons and nothing else.
What really happens to truly nice people is the tragedy. They seem to always get usurped by the pretenders. I think it is a rare miracle that truly nice people get to the top. And if they do, I think even there, if they are truly nice, some group is always working at them to tear them down and then feeling jubilant when the person displays a self-defensive so-called "mean streak".
*************
I watched "The Negotiator". It started with a preview of a movie with the words "Execute them!" Sounds like the U.S. to me. They don't like what someone has to say and it's "execute them," right? I saw this clip with Obama and the Homeland Security woman, giving a speech at 5 p.m. their time. Noticed the Department of State flag, neatly folded to display the "arrows of war" instead of the olive branch. Like that's a suprise. This government has tried to destroy my entire family with their "arrows". No, that's not true. It has allowed specific groups to make the attempt, by abusing government channels. Which hitman decided he couldn't "take the shot" at me?
Why doesn't someone just prepare to do the right thing and return my son. There is no other solution. Nothing else makes sense, nothing else is going to accomplish peace, and nothing else is morally or legally justified.
Janet Napolitano: ICE ICE Baby & "Privileged" Information
I was watching live coverage of Napolitano and remembered, "Oh yeah. Along with the NCIC, I have to request ICE records."
Homeland Security.
A reporter told me I needed to get my ICE records and file. I wrote down a list of records and files I was informed about, and I was encouraged to obtain all these things.
So he said, "Do you know about ICE?" and I said "No, what is that?" and he said, "It's the system of records and data for Homeland Security. You might want to get that."
I believe I still have a list somewhere, of the different agencies I was tipped off to, that I'd had no clue about.
Not only do I need the NCIC, which the FBI stalls over repeatedly, and has ignored for a full 8 years now...(I have making making FOIA and NCIC requests since 2004 and they have been refused to comply and lied), I am supposed to get the ICE records, and there are a couple of other systems of record collection.
Canada told me if I wanted their records, I had to go back to Canada in person. They refused to let my fax a copy of my ID and information and said I had to travel to Canada.
However, the WA AG has a lot of those records, and they withheld everything from Canada, from my attorneys and me. I mean, one would THINK that records from Canada are evidence which are important for my CPS case. Wouldn't you think? But I remember someone trying to say it was "privileged". Sorry. It's not privileged. You used it in your CPS case against me and it's not privileged.
There are certain attorney-client communications that are privileged, but your arrangments with Canadian officials, which were used to directly affect the outcome of this case, are NOT "priviledged", they KNEW this, and they withheld evidence.
As lawyers, the AG knew very well that they were withholding evidence that did not fall under the "privileged" exclusion. Their communications and contributions to affect what was done in Canada was all evidence that they were required by law to submit to my attorneys and they didn't. I had a right to know who, among the State and federal agencies, and Canadian officials, were my accusers.
They knew this. They didn't want me to know.
Not only that, any "communications" between the U.S. to Canada against me are not privileged. There is no "public interest immunity" (no LPP). International collusion does not get privileges.
They knew this. They KNEW and they withheld some of the most pertinent information.
Reporter, reporter,...Can you believe that I still have the list of agencies to contact? and where are you old retired FBI lawyer friend? I'm sure you have followed my case and wondered what side of the pig the FBI has been on. That would be, the lawyer who used to be FBI, who was the first person to say I needed to request the NCIC. That was in 2004.
Look at what the FBI has done to me since 2004.
Oh. I'm on the UK forum about privilege. Well then. I have a feeling the same thing applies with the U.S.
Homeland Security.
A reporter told me I needed to get my ICE records and file. I wrote down a list of records and files I was informed about, and I was encouraged to obtain all these things.
So he said, "Do you know about ICE?" and I said "No, what is that?" and he said, "It's the system of records and data for Homeland Security. You might want to get that."
I believe I still have a list somewhere, of the different agencies I was tipped off to, that I'd had no clue about.
Not only do I need the NCIC, which the FBI stalls over repeatedly, and has ignored for a full 8 years now...(I have making making FOIA and NCIC requests since 2004 and they have been refused to comply and lied), I am supposed to get the ICE records, and there are a couple of other systems of record collection.
Canada told me if I wanted their records, I had to go back to Canada in person. They refused to let my fax a copy of my ID and information and said I had to travel to Canada.
However, the WA AG has a lot of those records, and they withheld everything from Canada, from my attorneys and me. I mean, one would THINK that records from Canada are evidence which are important for my CPS case. Wouldn't you think? But I remember someone trying to say it was "privileged". Sorry. It's not privileged. You used it in your CPS case against me and it's not privileged.
There are certain attorney-client communications that are privileged, but your arrangments with Canadian officials, which were used to directly affect the outcome of this case, are NOT "priviledged", they KNEW this, and they withheld evidence.
As lawyers, the AG knew very well that they were withholding evidence that did not fall under the "privileged" exclusion. Their communications and contributions to affect what was done in Canada was all evidence that they were required by law to submit to my attorneys and they didn't. I had a right to know who, among the State and federal agencies, and Canadian officials, were my accusers.
They knew this. They didn't want me to know.
Not only that, any "communications" between the U.S. to Canada against me are not privileged. There is no "public interest immunity" (no LPP). International collusion does not get privileges.
They knew this. They KNEW and they withheld some of the most pertinent information.
Reporter, reporter,...Can you believe that I still have the list of agencies to contact? and where are you old retired FBI lawyer friend? I'm sure you have followed my case and wondered what side of the pig the FBI has been on. That would be, the lawyer who used to be FBI, who was the first person to say I needed to request the NCIC. That was in 2004.
Look at what the FBI has done to me since 2004.
Oh. I'm on the UK forum about privilege. Well then. I have a feeling the same thing applies with the U.S.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)