I left a msg with my ex, who keeps telling me to call him, and asked why it is he wants me to call him over and over but he's not calling me, when he has my phone number. One minute, he sounds very serious about wanting to get back together and then it's the reverse. If he's recently broken up with someone, he's all over it and if someone new is slapping his bottom, and he some place to dig in the dirt, I guess he's content. So, no word yet. We'll see.
Then, there was someone who was parked outside of my place, in a gold sedan with tinted windows a day or two ago and I know it was someone I knew but I didn't know who. I didn't know if it was him or someone else.
My guess is that someone got wind he might get back together with me and they hastened a woman back to him, or into his path. Not that it would have happened anyway, but this is what I'm thinking. Talk about honey pot. I wonder how much she's getting paid. I would bet, odds 8 to 2, the current woman is also with an intelligence agency. I would put money on it.
Maybe I SHOULD set up shop for readings. I don't know. Maybe I should do egg donation and try to practice my gift in readings too. I could have 2 businesses. And it's all perfect for the next Queen of England. Egg donor consultant (I told my ex: "kate is selling party hats and I'm selling babies") and paid psychic.
WAAAAAaaaaalllis. WAAAAAaalliss....Ya got any advice for me??? Caaawwwling Wallice. Oops. Wallis.
Oh, and by the way, I had a nice gay couple want me to be their traditional surrogate in D.C. but I took one look at the featured photo, of "Wallace" and said to myself, "Um, no, this isn't serious and it will never happen. This is a joke." It was a Catholic guy and a Jewish guy and the Jewish guy (the one I talked to, who was very pleasant and good natured to speak with) had Wallace from this English cartoon featured. Wallace and gammit? or something. But he didn't spell the name right and I figure, if you're really a fan and it's not a joke, and you're a highly paid, intellectual professional, you probably don't mispell this name unless you really don't know what it's about. Just my opinion and might be wrong, but I felt I was being screened more than anything.
He said something about exploitation of surrogates in India. Which I had actually looked up and it's a serious thing. Then, you look at Washington state and they claim it's "exploitation" to pay higher prices for egg donors. There is some recommendation from a medical place to limit compensation. I think this is so backwards. Either you don't allow payment at ALL, and it's purely a humanitarian thing to do for someone else, or if you put a price on it and compensate, you don't compensate like sports shoe factory workers overseas. You pay people well, and for such an important thing, very well indeed, in my opinion. What is exploitative, is offering compensation to lure women in the first place, but making it as cheap and low as possible, and taking advantage of some women's desperate situations in order to get away with compensating them with as little as possible. My opinion is you either ban payment all the way, or you allow it and encourage women to be paid very well. Then, it's not exploitation. Going to some other country to dicker down to even cheaper prices to essentially "rent a womb" is even worse than taking business overseas for sweatshops. Really. Talk about a sweatshop. Imagine being pregnant in India in the summer.
I have even been thinking about becoming a dual citizen in another state so I am able to offer more to women than what is currently offered in Washington state, because I think the compensation should be more.
No comments:
Post a Comment