Bill Gates & John Kerry (obstruction of justice, tampering of evidence)

I am thinking Gates and Kerry might be friends.

It is possibly through their wives that the friendship more closely exists, I am not sure.  Melinda Gates and Theresa Heintz are both Catholic women and my email account block from Microsoft, occurred right after it was announced President Obama was electing John Kerry to be the head of Department of State.

My primary email account, that I've had since at least 2005 and probably earlier than that, is being blocked by Microsoft and it contains evidence and my legal files.

This blocking of my account, despite my giving them letters to prove my ID, occurs after the Sterling and Kerry families somehow involved themselves in having my Wells Fargo Bank account closed without notice to me, and had the records purged.  I was told I could still order them, but I would have to pay for it.

My bank records contain evidence against FBI employees.

The FBI knows this.

I have financial records that would prove my story against FBI agents Bujanda and Garza and Tancer.  Mike Tancer and John Kerry's son-in-law, Theresa Heinz's son, are good friends.  Mike asked me about my bank records and what was on them after he knew I was incapacitated.  He wanted to know how many of my drinks I had on record as paying for myself. 

This, combined with witness statements, is enough to determine how much alcohol was used and whether I was raped or not.

So within a day or two of Kerry's nomination, Microsoft got the word to be bold enough to block me from my own email account.

I am blocked, right now, from my business account with Wells Fargo Bank (held 10 years) and my primary email account that has my legal records against the FBI employees, Department of Justice employees (Christa Schneider), and all of my CPS and AG and lawyer records for my son's case, as well as business information (book selling) and my records of contacts requesting assistance for my son.

Microsoft wouldn't have waited until Kerry's nomination if they didn't think Kerry or his associates were involved and that now they had a cover through the new leader of the Department of State.

In addition to Microsoft's Melinda Gates (who works with Catholic Charities) and Theresa Heinz, there are the Catholic mothers of Robin Bechtold, Chris Dabney, Mark, Armando Garza, Raul Bujanda, Christa Schneider, Dylan, and the mothers of Josh Gatov, Mike Tancer, and Jonathan and Helen.

John Kerry's nomination must have given them confidence that they could block me from my email account without any notice or ability to retrieve my information.

John Kerry wouldn't matter unless he or his colleagues had something to do with what happened to me and my son, and also had something to do with people connected to assassination attempts against me, as well as having something to do with Alvaro Pardo and other Department of State/FBI persons involved.

As far as I know, Shannon Borg was working for the Department of State as well.  She knew Mike Tancer and she and her Canadian husband either worked for the Department of State or the FBI.  I had thought FBI but I'm not sure then why she would want the big CIA-style compass styled on her bathroom floor.  The compass design was like the CIA design on the floor of their "igloo" compound.

For some reason, every time I think about Alvaro, I just want a big bunch of onion rings.  Maybe it's the old throwback to the ones I got at our A&W as a kid.

I want really clear things in life.  My son.  That is my right.  And to not be tortured.  This is my right as well.  I didn't ask for CIA privileges and favors--I asked that my rights be honored.

If this is such a great country, where is the lawyer beating a path to my door to defend my rights.

How many law firms and lawyers have been "available", in this country, for defense of my rights and my son's rights, over horrific and aggregious crimes by the U.S.?  Not even a retired FBI employee who became a lawyer later?  Not the ACLU?

Where is your "system".  You HAVE NO justice "system". 

The fact that there is no justice system does not absolve the U.S. from their duty to correct crime.  Crime continues, and the clock is ticking.  This criminal activity accrues damages against me and my son, and the U.S. has not quit their criminal activity.  It is not my responsibility to find a lawyer when I am dealing with crime, not "civil liberties", but CRIMES that have obstructed these liberties.

I want my bank account opened.
My email account opened.
My son returned.
Criminals in jail.

You either DO what you are required to do if you TAKE taxpayer monies, or you QUIT.

TTSOML #72: Portland, Oregon FBI Contacts Me About PLF

When my lawyer, who had business with the Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon, finally let me know he was not going to file my case, I had less than two weeks left to file.

I went to the Oregon State Bar and they told me they would assist by setting me up with one of their lawyers, whom they said could draft the complaints so I wouldn't lose out on my claims.

They promised to provide me with an attorney, because my own lawyer was in the wrong. Because my attorney had quit last-minute, without proper notice, if I lost my claims, a lawsuit or complaint could be filed against HIM, and the Professional Liability Fund would be responsible for things.

Prior to having to use the PLF myself, I had contacted the Portland, Oregon FBI office about a matter.

The first time I ever made contact with any FBI office was before I had any personal dealings with the PLF. I had no agenda or motive. What happened, is that while doing research on my own claims, I had come across some cases which were available to the public online through the Oregon government/judicial website.

I found a case of fraud, which had been filed on behalf of a party which had gone to the PLF for assistance because of attorney misconduct. The PLF, they discovered, was fronting as another business as well, but concealing their identity. The Willamette Week had actually done an article about this, about Oregon's PLF and how what they had done, in this case, was wrong. I looked up statutes and felt it was not just "wrong" but actually met the conditions for fraud. I wanted to know why the Portland FBI didn't look into this and do their own investigation. It was corporate fraud, in my opinion, and it was misleading to the public. It fell within the FBI's jurisdiction.

I told ONE person, again, about calling the FBI. I wouldn't even tell HER what it was about ("her" being Christa Schneider). I kept the entire thing to myself even when she asked me what it was about. I told her it was just regarding something that had come up with I thought was wrong.

I remember it had to have been in 2002 or 2003, because I do remember all of this happened before I ever met Mike Tancer, whom I talked to later, about wanting to join the FBI myself. I am pretty sure it was 2002, because it was before I had even filed my lawsuits against the Abbey or The Willamette Week. After all my TTSOML posts, I will write out the exact timeline of everything, with dates.

My first contact to the FBI, which was through the Portland Field Office, was out of concern for the public interest and it had nothing to do with me.

I first called the general line. I didn't say what it was about, but asked whom I should contact or how to make a report of something. The FBI person I spoke with sent me to a man I talked to, who referred to himself as "S.A. Krouger." He said to go ahead and submit my complaint in writing, to his attention. So I did. It was very concise and in a business format, and I included a link to the Oregon Judicial website, to the page with the case.

I was also concerned about the nature of the PLF organization to begin with. Basically, it led the public to believe this was where one should go for help with a lawyer who had broken rules or had engaged in misconduct. It made itself sound like the regulatory body which governed lawyers in Oregon, and actually, this was true. But what was also true was that the Professional Liability Fund was primarily operating to cover their lawyers. They served the interests of the attorneys in the state, not the public really. Their responsibilities were to the Oregon lawyers. What the public didn't always know, in addition to not knowing about a certain business operating as a front for the PLF, was that the Oregon State Bar and the Professional Liabilty Fund were directly connected. If someone filed a complaint with the Bar, and the Bar decided a lawyer had done wrong, then the whole matter went to the Professional Liability Fund, where one could resolve or "settle" the matter by collecting for damages. The PLF paid out on behalf of the Oregon lawyers. It's one thing to have an organization where the duties are towards the lawyers, and it's another thing to mislead the public about a potential conflict of interest. If the Oregon State Bar limited how many of the Oregon lawyers were found "guilty" of misconduct and ethical violations, they also limited the damages paid out by the PLF. And the OSB people and the PLF people were connected. Of course, lawyers also wanted to keep their "dues" down, so I wasn't surprised not many Oregon lawyers were taking up a case against the Bar or PLF on behalf of the public.

One lawyer, or team, did try to get them for fraudulent business front, but the PLF got away with it. Who makes the decisions? Judges. It was one big legal and judicial mess, and I thought perhaps the FBI would be removed enough to look into it and open their own investigation.

After I sent my email, I didn't make any other contact with the FBI. I told absolutely no one I'd even contacted the FBI, except Christa, and I gave her ZERO hints as to what it was about or who it was about. She asked if it was about the Abbey or anyone and I just said I couldn't say anything one way or the other because it was confidential.

A man ended up contacting me, one day, when I wasn't even thinking about it anymore. Basically, I wrote my short email, and left it to the FBI to decide on. This man who called me up told me he was from Portland FBI field offices. He said he'd gone over my email and had some questions for me. He wasn't S.A. Krouger because his voice was different. This guy was a little more aggressive or assertive.

He asked me how I found out about the PLF. He asked me if I had any dealings with them (the answer was "No"). He asked me if I knew the lawyer who had filed a case against the PLF. My answer was "no" and I didn't even recognize his name. This FBI guy didn't identify himself at all except to say he'd received my email at their offices. I believed him, because no one else knew what I'd even reported. Only the FBI would have known.

So he goes on to tell me I wasn't the only one who had made a report about this matter, but that my report was "the most cogent" one they'd received. I remembered this word because at the time I didn't even know what "cogent" meant, though I supposed it was a good thing because his tone was complimentary.

But then his tone changed and he said it wasn't fraud. I said it sure fit the definition for fraud that I was reading, and I'd gone over the FBI jurisdictions and definitions before filing a report as well. I knew it DID fit for fraud and should be investigated and I gave him the points why. He tried to argue and then said in a cold tone that maybe I should just get together with "so-and-so" (the name of the lawyer who took the case to court) and we could file a lawsuit. He made it sound like I was "in on something" with another party or something but I wasn't. Then he just said he wasn't going to investigate and hung up.

That was it. I thought it was wrong, but I didn't contact the FBI again, unless I possibly sent a follow-up email after my conversation with this one guy. I do know I later sent something to the FBI, an email, inquiring about employment with the FBI. I was interested in possibly investigative work myself, or in being a lawyer for the FBI, and I had a particular interest in corporate crime. I felt white collar criminals got away with far too much, and fighting it would be a way to serve the public with government money, and not go into the hole financially. At that time, I was probably more interested in investigative work, than legal work.

No one contacted me after I sent this email out. I believe I sent it Attn: S.A. Krouger again, because I wouldn't have known where to send it otherwise.

No one contacted me and I dropped it. I had other things to take care of, I thought, and I hadn't even filed my lawsuits yet, and I didn't make contact with anyone from the FBI again until I met S.A. Raul Bujanda at an Oregon federal courthouse, at least a year or more later.

I never told anyone what I had reported until after I left Oregon for Washington State, in 2004, after I was assaulted/harassed by FBI employees Bujanda and Garza. No one knew, not even Christa. All anyone knew, was that I'd made a complaint. I told only Christa about even making a complaint.

Judge Hotchkiss: Not Going To Fact Finding--Going To Appeal

I'm starting to think I won't be going to the fact finding hearing on the 27th.

For one thing, I have no one to advise me. I asked for a public defender and have been refused one who does even reasonable work. The guarantee is not just for "public defense" but "reasonable public defense". I can easily argue my case has become prejudiced because of faulty public defense.

Then I was hung up on by the judge, in a hearing that had to do with important matters, after being told I had to go pro se. No one could defend me or my case. Not even myself. I have asked for the audio for that hearing and I was refused, told by Douglas County, when I called, that I would have to PAY for a copy. I didn't ask for a transcript. Just the audio. If I had a public defender, my defender would be getting these materials.

As it is, I have nothing to go off of. I'm also not a lawyer, and have had to work overtime and haven't had a chance to collect all the evidence which is necessary for my defense.

I get blamed by Wenatchee CPS for going to Washington D.C. and yet they fail to remind themselves that every action I've taken since they took my son, has been a RESPONSE and necessary action, to what THEY DID. If they had not taken my son, I wouldn't have been moving around. I wouldn't be scrambling for work either, or for a lawyer, because I would have been focusing on getting myself established in Canada and with my and my son's medical care there, which is what I had been doing.

I couldn't GET the help my son and I needed in Washington state, so I was forced to move. Wenatchee CPS seems to forget that THEY themselves tried to force me and my son out of the state by offering us a one-way bus pass out of the state after the first complaint by ER doctors, who asked for the same. My son and I couldn't get medical care in Wenatchee either, which we needed, and which was therefore another way of forcing us out.

All of a sudden, the lions want me back in the den. Hmmm. I wonder why.

Why should I have any FAITH at ALL, in their system, when I don't even KNOW what was said about me and decided, in the last hearing where I was hung up on by the judge? If they all want to claim I'm so mentally ill and crazy, what assurance do I have that I will not be court ordered to a psych ward, against my will, for evaluation, just so the judge can claim whatever he wants, to fit his own needs?

I have the state claiming I shouldn't even have telephone visitation with my son.

How am I supposed to argue my own defense without any character witnesses, or any knowledge of what has been said about me? Obviously, if the judge hung up on me, he thinks I'm disposable. He refused to give me another public defender too, and wouldn't take me seriously on the few motions and requests I did file.

Not only that, the department is supposed to pay for my transportation and lodging for going to and from hearings. It doesn't matter that I'm in D.C. The fact that I had to go where the opportunities are best for me isn't something for them to complain about. They put me in this position to begin with and this is THEIR game, not mine. Which is why the department is required to pay. Yet they refuse and I don't have a public defender making the necessary argument to get this done.

I also don't have a public defender writing the motions for reinstating visitation with my son.

I don't have enough money to both support myself and fly to a hearing where I would be a lone ranger among wolves.

Not only would they win, because I have nothing with me to defend myself with as I've had to work because I'm too DAMN AFRAID of the state to go on any kind of public assistance, for any reason ever again, after what they've done, I have no one backing me up.

My family is a bunch of religious crackpots who don't return my calls even when I do call, and I don't care to have anything to do with any of them. As for the way my son is being raised, it's a shame and he should be with me. He went from the best possible parenting to a totally different kind of parenting style and it's traumatized him.

I would be flying to Wenatchee, without a public defender or lawyer, and be eaten alive. And maybe even thrown into a psych ward against my will. It doesn't even matter that I'm working successfully in D.C. now, I have already seen the shit this town tries to pull, and they would do whatever they want to do and abuse their authority to get what they want.

I am still "indigent" and I still have a right to public defense. I have a right to legal audio tapes from hearings I was hung up on, and for all discovery from the state, which I've not received. I don't have one SHRED of discovery from the state, so how am I supposed to possibly defend myself and know what I'm up against?

I don't even have a guarantee of seeing my son, even after I specifically requested this.

Therefore, it seems when I'm denied a jury outright as this is no "right" to a parent, and then denied a public defender which IS a right...It seems my best option is to take this whole thing, when it goes down on the 27th, to appeal.

I have been put at the very worst possible disadvantage and I am literally AFRAID to go back to Wenatchee without legal representation. I can very easily prove reasons why I should BE afraid.

I may be brave most of the time, but I'm not stupid. And stupid is as stupid does, to quote Forest Gump. I think it would be stupid, actually, to go to Wenatchee without protection or someone backing me up.

I cannot think of one GOOD and fair thing Wenatchee has done for either me or my son.

And I'm not done writing about what has really been happening to me and my son, in my TTSOML posts.

Not only that, I have asked the FBI offices for FOIA from my complaint against their employees, several times, and did for over a year before I started getting profiled by police all the time, and then accused of being "drug-seeking" when I wasn't, and when one of their own agents was the one asking ME for some "reefer".

I think I could put up a better defense, in my defense against claims that I am or was ever "delusional" with some of the FOIA from the fucking FBI.

So where is it?

Do I have to call Raul Bujanda and Armando Garza to the stand, in my defense, to prove the Wenatchee ER doctors don't know shit about who I've known and what I was put through? All this "mentally ill" crap started, in my medical records, after the FBI shit. Before that, my medical records were clean, which is what someone already knew when my medical record disappeared from my house a year earlier when I still lived in Oregon.

I still want diagnostics for the radiation/electromagnetic crap too. If it can be tested, I will test positive for it. I told my date, who specialized in satellite and MRI technology, using electromagnetic waves, about my son's and my symptoms, and he was FREAKING out. He knew what I was saying was possible, and true, and yet kept shaking his head, saying he knew that happened in his former country of Iran but didn't know it happened in the U.S. He assumed U.S. because he said only government or someone in the government would have access to the kind of technology needed to do what had been done to me and my son. I told him how my nails and my sons nails and toenails were even warped from it and then grew out normal after we were removed from the location, and he was sweating. He knows what happens, because he and his team are currently testing the effects of MRI beams and overexposure, on pigs. All kinds of things happen. Twitching is just the beginning.

When Judge Hotchkiss decides to kiss my ass, I'll start kissing his. Hey Judge, in the meantime, why don't you beef up on your old 60s civil rights sentiments and read something for me? Pretty please? Read Howard Zinn's The Zinn Reader, and please make note of chapter 2 in Part 4, about civil obedience.

You pretty much made up your own rules when you denied me a lawyer and then told me to fuck myself when you hung up on me. It's just too bad that YOUR form of disobedience is actually something called "bullying" and "abuse of authority".

You give me one good reason why I should be at the hearing for fact finding, when you have refused me a lawyer, discovery, any and all audio of hearings, and due process.

Motive (?): Things I Reported Prior To Electromagnetic/Radiation Exposure

I've been thinking about anyone and everyone I could have angered or made mad prior to what began to happen with me and my son. I've already listed the possibility of some fringe Catholic group (just an extremist group), or the FBI or someone within law enforcement after I reported the FBI employees in Oregon. There were a few others though.

The car vandalisms were so bad, and I had officers in Wenatchee tell me to move away from the area. No one else in my neighborhood had the constant vandalisms that I did.

I reported Judge Warren to Wes with the Wenatchee FBI for unethical judicial practices (refusing to file kites and telling his clerks not to file anything, for one).

When I had to look for new housing for me and my son, I went to a Russian restaurant in town, owned by a couple who had emigrated here. I met with them right after the thing with Alexander Litvinenko happened in England, where he was poisoned and died, withering away in a hospital and blaming the Russian government. I brought it up to the man, just for conversation, and I said it was scary and this man looked at me hard and said, "He should have kept his mouth SHUT" and then went on to defend the killing of this journalist. I thought perhaps it was just "talk" but the sincerity he had scared me. He told me he had relatives and brothers that would "take care of people" who got in the way. So I actually called or emailed (I don't remember which) the CIA and made a report. I said I didn't know much about them but that I was concerned about why they were in the states with such opinions which could just be random, or NOT. This couple had a disabled son whom they introduced me to after I had bragged about how smart my son was. Their son was totally autistic or mentally retarded and was a grown man. Very sweet, but I could tell they didn't like me after I had been bragging about how smart my son was and how he was hitting his milestones so in advance. I told them I thought he was sort of a genuis because of the things he'd been doing and I had confirmed his abilities were unusual with other parents of exceptionally gifted children online, and through reading about milestones. I documented all my sons milestones. So here I'd been bragging, and made a misstep of offending by bringing up Boris. I can't rmeember the guys last name but I'll look it up. (it wasn't Boris, Alexander Litvinenko)At any rate, after I reported to the CIA, shortly after this, the stuff began to happen to me and my son. And then after it was already going on, I saw the Russian guy's wife following me to the library in E.Wenatchee one day and she just observed me and smirked smugly. I had a really bad feeling about it. That was the only time I ran into her. But she just stared and stared, and smirked, and looked over at my son. I told Christa Schneider about what had happened, I remember, or about my conversation with them. I also told her about contacting the Protestant Irish militias. She asked me for all the details about this and shortly after, was asking where my son and I slept, near a window and which one in the house, etc. Also asked me how I least wanted to die and I said death didn't frighten me, but torture did.

I also contacted the Protestant version of "militia" from Ireland, just the Orange order and a few others, Ulster something or other, asking what I should do given my constant car vandalisms and problems which began after I first reported the higher ranking officials at the RCC Abbey. I wasn't joining a militia or giving them support in any way, but I knew my son and I needed protection and felt we were in danger and no one was listening to me. They were telling me to "move" but to where? I'd already moved and I was easily found and the same stuff was happening there. So I don't know, if someone thought I was a Protestant militia or something, would they go after my son and I? The thing is, I tend to think the militias, Protestant or Catholic, don't go after civilians unless they're heaviliy involved in stuff. And I wasn't and am not. I questioned all the propoganda and efforts to smear me by certain members in the Catholic church, and I knew some group had been doing the car vandalisms since I reported...I also had my house broken into and, for example, in Oregon, only my MEDICAL RECORDS were stolen ??? What kind of robber only takes medical records? I had a huge stack and told a couple friends about it and how I was going to get a P.I. lawyer for the hit-and-run which damaged my knee, and then use some of the money to get a lawyer to sue the Mt. Angel Abbey for civil rights violations.

Also, I told my friends, RIGHT before I "met" these FBI employees at the federal courthouse in Portland, Oregon, that my goal was to finish well in college (I was improving upon my GPA, which was then at 3.6), apply to a top-tier law school, get my license, and then apply to the FBI through the lawyer referral program. My objective was to fight corporate crime from the inside, with government money, because I was told, by lawyers, that it's extremely difficult to be a civil rights attorney without being independently wealthy. I wasn't independently wealthy. So if money was needed to fight for people's rights, I thought it would be good to have government backing. Only problem is, I told my friends, some who were not friends I later discovered, that one of the things I wanted to do, was try to reverse church standing as privileged organizations to the same rules and regulations which apply to regular business corporations. I also wanted to hold clergy accountable under RICO, from any church religion (Protestant, Catholic, Mormon, Jewish, Muslim, Etc) for child abuse and other things. I felt it had been wrong not to treat these crimes as crimes, and organizaed crimes by the very fact there was clear obstruction of justice, fraud, and manipulation of others, across state lines and even country boundaries. There was already a team of attorneys making this argument, headed under a Mr. Anderson, who was actually even naming the Vatican, but it was more of a longshot. On this count, though, I wasn't just wanting to go aftr the RCC, but ANY and EVERY church which tried to escape accountability by hiding under their religious privileges and excuses. I also wanted to go after Enrons and white collar corporate crime, because of the vast damage it does to countless private citizens and the common good. White collar crime isn't prosecuted in the same way petty theives are, and white collar criminals fight back, with money and power and often win their own cases. I want life to be fair. For everyone. It's not, but I wanted to make a difference and try.

These are the things which were going on, besides state problems, immediately prior to what happened to me and my son. I don't know exactly who did it, but it happened. And more than one group or person could have had motive and means.

Believe me.

I had also been bragging about my son and all his accomplishments, through tons of email, to Christa Schneider, and I told her over the phone that I thought my son was going to grow up with a strong will like me, and that he was so smart, and loved me so much, when he was older and found out what had been done to me, through the harassment, criminal use of police by church, and defamation (newspaper article), that he would defend me and people would know, as my own son lived with me, there was nothing wrong with me. I said I thought my son might follow in my footsteps and be an activist, but that I didn't care what he did as long as he was happy. By that time, I knew things weren't adding up with my friendship with this woman who kept pressuring me to send her my "book" about what happened with the RCC and how she'd edit it for me, and how after I spoke with her about my FBI interest, I was meeting FBI who were also Catholic and then got into my house and assaulted me. So, I was laying it on thick, sending email after email about what my son was doing now, and how bright he was. I bragged about him and nothing else, and did it intentionally, to annoy. The thing is, with Schneider, I would give info to her and then something would happen when she was the only one I told. For example, I told her I was filing an important motion at the bankruptcy court (Archdiocese bankruptcy) and what time I was going (bc she'd ask) and then when I got there, there was a service guy for the Catholic church lawyers, WAITING for me, and then slapping me with a motion, saying "you're served" before I could file, to prevent me from getting my thing filed first. How did HE know I was going to be there? I only told her. Things were happening like this all the time. Another thing, when I met the FBI guy I first met, it was at a federal courthouse I'd told Schneider I was planning to walk over to, if I lost a hearing at the state district courthouse (which was across the street). I told her if I lost, I was walking straight over to the federal courthouse and going up the elevator to file. The FBI guy came in after me, not before. He came in after me, but moved ahead of me so that he was BEFORE me in line. After he got through security first, he waited to see which direction I was going and went the same way and then he followed me up to the floor where I was headed.

I met the FBI guys after I dated (very briefly) Mike Tancer, a guy I'd met whose family has a winery in CA (Ironhorse is the name). I'd told Mike about my interest in the FBI and he asked me if I was FBI. I told him no, but I wanted to work as a lawyer for the FBI. I was telling Schneider the same thing, but told her my objectives, and didn't tell Mike this. It was shortly after dating Mike Tancer that I met the FBI guys.

I had an FBI business card, from Raul Bujanda, the agent I met in the federal courthouse. Bujanda wrote 3 numbers on the back of his card: cell, business, and home. He asked me to call him and to go out. I said okay, and didn't know he was married. I found out about that later, after I'd reported him to the FBI for what he and his "boss", Armando Garza did (which I haven't written about yet). I had that business card on my windowsill in my kitchen. I didn't move it or take it anywhere. After I reported him to the FBI, it disappeared one day later. I couldn't tell anyone had been in my house at all. It was absolutely undisturbed, except the business card was gone. Not that the waitresses couldn't have confirmed where we had all been the night before. I was out with them, and they were really FBI, but the business card disappeared. Only the FBI or someone working on behalf of Bujanda and Garza would have motive to do this.

I was doing this at the same time I met the Russian couple, contacted CIA, and wrote Irish militia.

I made someone mad.

And what happened, HAPPENED. This post is absolutely true, as much as my TTSOML posts.

I swear the above statement is true and is made to the best of my belief and knowledge, and is subject to penalty for perjury in a court of law, and may be used as evidence.