The FBI's solution to a woman being gang-raped by federal employees, is to tell her to fuck their agent or "it's too late".
The FBI retaliated against me, after I made significant reports about being raped by federal employees, defamed me, tortured me and kidnapped my son.
Then they told me I either married Alvaro Pardo, an agent who worked for them (through the Department of State arrangement) or it was "too late" for my son to be returned to me, when they conspired to illegally take him in retaliation for my reports.
When Lucretia Krebs, the only "witness" for the state, claimed she didn't know "what Cameo's problem is" and then AG Mary Anne McIntosh interjected, "But you know there isn't enough time for this to be figured out and for Ms. Garrett to admit she has a problem", the FBI and AG (Mary Anne is a military brat) blamed me for being raped.
In return for reporting rapes by federal employees, these women, who are connected to the organizations the men worked for, retaliated by saying I was the one with a problem and since I dared say I was raped, I was mentally ill and they were taking my son. The United States federal government and state were taking my son, in retaliation, to be precise.
Mary Anne's son-in-law is a cop. All of the individuals who were involved in retaliation against me for my reports of hate crime from government employees, were married to the perpetrators and colleagues of the perpetrators.
So the FBI's solution to rape reports, is to pay a reporter to smear me, block me from traveling to court so I was forced out of the lawsuits that protected my name, and then tell everyone the rape victim "is too mentally ill to raise her child and there is not enough time for her to figure this out unless she marries Department of State-FBI employee Alvaro Pardo."
Sounds like The Fucking Cure to me. More exactly, it sounds like, instead of "Anna O's Talking Cure", the FBI proposed a "Cameo's Fucking Feds Cure".
I would like to see The Fucking Cure in the American Psychological Association very soon. You can credit me with the discovery. You are welcome to use my situation with the United States federal government, and Alvaro Pardo as a case study in FBI Psychology.
Instead of hiring psychologists and mental health professionals and counselors to "listen to us" "talk" about our problems as a "cure" to stress or trauma, now we can call the Department of State and FBI and ask them which of their employees is ready to fuck. Fucking us, or fucking us over, is the same thing, but this is what the U.S. has said the "cure" for "whistleblowers" is. To fuck their people and then the war is over if you agree to marry one of them.
So sign up soon for The Department of State Fucking Cure and call Angelina Jolie if you have questions. After the Department of State introduces and "rehabilitates" whistleblowers with The Fucking Cure, then they will ask you to sign up for The Marriage Cure.
Which is something George W. Bush II was hoping to turn into an "incentive" program while he was still in office. If you get married, you get to keep your kids, keep a tax break, and get a bonus check.
Instead of getting routed to the Professional Liability Fund, after making a report about misconduct by lawyers, the FBI and Department of State will route you to one of their employees who will be matched to fucking you for The Fucking Cure.
If you choose not to marry the employee assigned to you as The Fucking Cure for the United States "professional" defense, your children that were taken away from you in retaliation for your attempt to leave the country after being tortured and falsely arrested after reporting federal employees for rape, will be kept.
So it's your choice Whistleblower. Either you accept The Fucking Cure and marry into the organization that has employed the rapists, for their sense of security and "peace of mind", and let them feel like your "saving grace", or you get to lose your child forever, to the government, because they will say "there's not enough time for Ms. Garrett to recognize she needs our Fucking Cure" and "Ms. Garrett was not willing to accept our Marriage Incentive Package For Whistleblowers".
Please call your local offices at The Department of State and FBI to find out how long the waiting list is for The Fucking Cure.
The Fucking Cure is an attempt to see if you will be "cured" of your ideas that your own country allowed and encouraged some of their employees to torture you and rape you. If the U.S. can instill any sense of an attachment, physical or emotional, between the whistleblower and one of their employees, the U.S. Attorneys will be able to call Mr. President and let him know the liability problem is being resolved. If you agree to marry one of the employees from a U.S. Department that encouraged their agents to rape you, then they call the state and intelligence agencies or police departments and issue the statement that "the brainwashing has been successful after 400 hours of The Fucking Cure".
Official State Cable Report:
Ms. Garrett is no longer focused on suing the Department and is not actively seeking options through The Hague Convention. We feel The Fucking Cure has been successful enough and that further Fucking after marriage, which Ms. Garrett (whistleblower #29833) has agreed to, will be likely to prevent a lawsuit. We would expect Ms. Garrett to be equally willing to accept an offer of employment with our department as further security that she is going to be cooperative. The recommendation of the Department, at this time, is that Ms. Garrett's son be returned to her as we do not believe we are "at risk" of being sued any longer and the threat has been minimized in a sufficient time. The statute of limitations for Hague options is also no longer a concern as they expired while we had Ms. Garrett engaged in The Fucking Cure and assured her that her son would be returned.
Should Ms. Garrett lapse into her former opinions and report making again, our employee who took Ms. Garrett into The Fucking Cure assignment, has stated he is able to make statements sufficient as her legal partner, for having her admitted to a psychiatric unit. At that point we would proceed with divorce papers and establish grounds for sole custody of the child into the control of Alvaro Pardo and our Department. We retain the option of putting Ms. Garrett into jail at any time, as well, as a means of pressuring her by fabricated reports. Mr. Pardo agrees to continue medicating Ms. Garrett while she is living with him. He has also consented to programming operations on the child, Oliver Garrett and will continue to provide feedback with his predictions and current work in our intelligence operations.
We believe we may be able to sub-let fucking rights of Ms. Garrett to other employees while she is legally married to Alvaro Pardo as well and we have not ruled out this option.
cc:
FBI
Portland Police Department
Wenatchee/East Wenatchee Police Department
Washington State Patrol
Oregon State Patrol
Mt. Angel Abbey Police Department
CIA
Pentagon
NASA
NSA
Secret Service/U.S. Marshalls
Attorney General
President of the United States
Child Protective Services
Canadian Immigration
RCMP/Penticton
Canadian Embassy Washington D.C.
Her Majesty The Queen (England)
MI6
Mossad
Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon
The Holy See
Arthur K. Smith
George W. Bush II
Hillary Clinton
Embassy of Colombia
U.S. Department of Justice
Western Psychological
Showing posts with label PLF. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PLF. Show all posts
Saturday, June 1, 2013
Saturday, September 6, 2008
TTSOML #72: Portland, Oregon FBI Contacts Me About PLF
When my lawyer, who had business with the Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon, finally let me know he was not going to file my case, I had less than two weeks left to file.
I went to the Oregon State Bar and they told me they would assist by setting me up with one of their lawyers, whom they said could draft the complaints so I wouldn't lose out on my claims.
They promised to provide me with an attorney, because my own lawyer was in the wrong. Because my attorney had quit last-minute, without proper notice, if I lost my claims, a lawsuit or complaint could be filed against HIM, and the Professional Liability Fund would be responsible for things.
Prior to having to use the PLF myself, I had contacted the Portland, Oregon FBI office about a matter.
The first time I ever made contact with any FBI office was before I had any personal dealings with the PLF. I had no agenda or motive. What happened, is that while doing research on my own claims, I had come across some cases which were available to the public online through the Oregon government/judicial website.
I found a case of fraud, which had been filed on behalf of a party which had gone to the PLF for assistance because of attorney misconduct. The PLF, they discovered, was fronting as another business as well, but concealing their identity. The Willamette Week had actually done an article about this, about Oregon's PLF and how what they had done, in this case, was wrong. I looked up statutes and felt it was not just "wrong" but actually met the conditions for fraud. I wanted to know why the Portland FBI didn't look into this and do their own investigation. It was corporate fraud, in my opinion, and it was misleading to the public. It fell within the FBI's jurisdiction.
I told ONE person, again, about calling the FBI. I wouldn't even tell HER what it was about ("her" being Christa Schneider). I kept the entire thing to myself even when she asked me what it was about. I told her it was just regarding something that had come up with I thought was wrong.
I remember it had to have been in 2002 or 2003, because I do remember all of this happened before I ever met Mike Tancer, whom I talked to later, about wanting to join the FBI myself. I am pretty sure it was 2002, because it was before I had even filed my lawsuits against the Abbey or The Willamette Week. After all my TTSOML posts, I will write out the exact timeline of everything, with dates.
My first contact to the FBI, which was through the Portland Field Office, was out of concern for the public interest and it had nothing to do with me.
I first called the general line. I didn't say what it was about, but asked whom I should contact or how to make a report of something. The FBI person I spoke with sent me to a man I talked to, who referred to himself as "S.A. Krouger." He said to go ahead and submit my complaint in writing, to his attention. So I did. It was very concise and in a business format, and I included a link to the Oregon Judicial website, to the page with the case.
I was also concerned about the nature of the PLF organization to begin with. Basically, it led the public to believe this was where one should go for help with a lawyer who had broken rules or had engaged in misconduct. It made itself sound like the regulatory body which governed lawyers in Oregon, and actually, this was true. But what was also true was that the Professional Liability Fund was primarily operating to cover their lawyers. They served the interests of the attorneys in the state, not the public really. Their responsibilities were to the Oregon lawyers. What the public didn't always know, in addition to not knowing about a certain business operating as a front for the PLF, was that the Oregon State Bar and the Professional Liabilty Fund were directly connected. If someone filed a complaint with the Bar, and the Bar decided a lawyer had done wrong, then the whole matter went to the Professional Liability Fund, where one could resolve or "settle" the matter by collecting for damages. The PLF paid out on behalf of the Oregon lawyers. It's one thing to have an organization where the duties are towards the lawyers, and it's another thing to mislead the public about a potential conflict of interest. If the Oregon State Bar limited how many of the Oregon lawyers were found "guilty" of misconduct and ethical violations, they also limited the damages paid out by the PLF. And the OSB people and the PLF people were connected. Of course, lawyers also wanted to keep their "dues" down, so I wasn't surprised not many Oregon lawyers were taking up a case against the Bar or PLF on behalf of the public.
One lawyer, or team, did try to get them for fraudulent business front, but the PLF got away with it. Who makes the decisions? Judges. It was one big legal and judicial mess, and I thought perhaps the FBI would be removed enough to look into it and open their own investigation.
After I sent my email, I didn't make any other contact with the FBI. I told absolutely no one I'd even contacted the FBI, except Christa, and I gave her ZERO hints as to what it was about or who it was about. She asked if it was about the Abbey or anyone and I just said I couldn't say anything one way or the other because it was confidential.
A man ended up contacting me, one day, when I wasn't even thinking about it anymore. Basically, I wrote my short email, and left it to the FBI to decide on. This man who called me up told me he was from Portland FBI field offices. He said he'd gone over my email and had some questions for me. He wasn't S.A. Krouger because his voice was different. This guy was a little more aggressive or assertive.
He asked me how I found out about the PLF. He asked me if I had any dealings with them (the answer was "No"). He asked me if I knew the lawyer who had filed a case against the PLF. My answer was "no" and I didn't even recognize his name. This FBI guy didn't identify himself at all except to say he'd received my email at their offices. I believed him, because no one else knew what I'd even reported. Only the FBI would have known.
So he goes on to tell me I wasn't the only one who had made a report about this matter, but that my report was "the most cogent" one they'd received. I remembered this word because at the time I didn't even know what "cogent" meant, though I supposed it was a good thing because his tone was complimentary.
But then his tone changed and he said it wasn't fraud. I said it sure fit the definition for fraud that I was reading, and I'd gone over the FBI jurisdictions and definitions before filing a report as well. I knew it DID fit for fraud and should be investigated and I gave him the points why. He tried to argue and then said in a cold tone that maybe I should just get together with "so-and-so" (the name of the lawyer who took the case to court) and we could file a lawsuit. He made it sound like I was "in on something" with another party or something but I wasn't. Then he just said he wasn't going to investigate and hung up.
That was it. I thought it was wrong, but I didn't contact the FBI again, unless I possibly sent a follow-up email after my conversation with this one guy. I do know I later sent something to the FBI, an email, inquiring about employment with the FBI. I was interested in possibly investigative work myself, or in being a lawyer for the FBI, and I had a particular interest in corporate crime. I felt white collar criminals got away with far too much, and fighting it would be a way to serve the public with government money, and not go into the hole financially. At that time, I was probably more interested in investigative work, than legal work.
No one contacted me after I sent this email out. I believe I sent it Attn: S.A. Krouger again, because I wouldn't have known where to send it otherwise.
No one contacted me and I dropped it. I had other things to take care of, I thought, and I hadn't even filed my lawsuits yet, and I didn't make contact with anyone from the FBI again until I met S.A. Raul Bujanda at an Oregon federal courthouse, at least a year or more later.
I never told anyone what I had reported until after I left Oregon for Washington State, in 2004, after I was assaulted/harassed by FBI employees Bujanda and Garza. No one knew, not even Christa. All anyone knew, was that I'd made a complaint. I told only Christa about even making a complaint.
I went to the Oregon State Bar and they told me they would assist by setting me up with one of their lawyers, whom they said could draft the complaints so I wouldn't lose out on my claims.
They promised to provide me with an attorney, because my own lawyer was in the wrong. Because my attorney had quit last-minute, without proper notice, if I lost my claims, a lawsuit or complaint could be filed against HIM, and the Professional Liability Fund would be responsible for things.
Prior to having to use the PLF myself, I had contacted the Portland, Oregon FBI office about a matter.
The first time I ever made contact with any FBI office was before I had any personal dealings with the PLF. I had no agenda or motive. What happened, is that while doing research on my own claims, I had come across some cases which were available to the public online through the Oregon government/judicial website.
I found a case of fraud, which had been filed on behalf of a party which had gone to the PLF for assistance because of attorney misconduct. The PLF, they discovered, was fronting as another business as well, but concealing their identity. The Willamette Week had actually done an article about this, about Oregon's PLF and how what they had done, in this case, was wrong. I looked up statutes and felt it was not just "wrong" but actually met the conditions for fraud. I wanted to know why the Portland FBI didn't look into this and do their own investigation. It was corporate fraud, in my opinion, and it was misleading to the public. It fell within the FBI's jurisdiction.
I told ONE person, again, about calling the FBI. I wouldn't even tell HER what it was about ("her" being Christa Schneider). I kept the entire thing to myself even when she asked me what it was about. I told her it was just regarding something that had come up with I thought was wrong.
I remember it had to have been in 2002 or 2003, because I do remember all of this happened before I ever met Mike Tancer, whom I talked to later, about wanting to join the FBI myself. I am pretty sure it was 2002, because it was before I had even filed my lawsuits against the Abbey or The Willamette Week. After all my TTSOML posts, I will write out the exact timeline of everything, with dates.
My first contact to the FBI, which was through the Portland Field Office, was out of concern for the public interest and it had nothing to do with me.
I first called the general line. I didn't say what it was about, but asked whom I should contact or how to make a report of something. The FBI person I spoke with sent me to a man I talked to, who referred to himself as "S.A. Krouger." He said to go ahead and submit my complaint in writing, to his attention. So I did. It was very concise and in a business format, and I included a link to the Oregon Judicial website, to the page with the case.
I was also concerned about the nature of the PLF organization to begin with. Basically, it led the public to believe this was where one should go for help with a lawyer who had broken rules or had engaged in misconduct. It made itself sound like the regulatory body which governed lawyers in Oregon, and actually, this was true. But what was also true was that the Professional Liability Fund was primarily operating to cover their lawyers. They served the interests of the attorneys in the state, not the public really. Their responsibilities were to the Oregon lawyers. What the public didn't always know, in addition to not knowing about a certain business operating as a front for the PLF, was that the Oregon State Bar and the Professional Liabilty Fund were directly connected. If someone filed a complaint with the Bar, and the Bar decided a lawyer had done wrong, then the whole matter went to the Professional Liability Fund, where one could resolve or "settle" the matter by collecting for damages. The PLF paid out on behalf of the Oregon lawyers. It's one thing to have an organization where the duties are towards the lawyers, and it's another thing to mislead the public about a potential conflict of interest. If the Oregon State Bar limited how many of the Oregon lawyers were found "guilty" of misconduct and ethical violations, they also limited the damages paid out by the PLF. And the OSB people and the PLF people were connected. Of course, lawyers also wanted to keep their "dues" down, so I wasn't surprised not many Oregon lawyers were taking up a case against the Bar or PLF on behalf of the public.
One lawyer, or team, did try to get them for fraudulent business front, but the PLF got away with it. Who makes the decisions? Judges. It was one big legal and judicial mess, and I thought perhaps the FBI would be removed enough to look into it and open their own investigation.
After I sent my email, I didn't make any other contact with the FBI. I told absolutely no one I'd even contacted the FBI, except Christa, and I gave her ZERO hints as to what it was about or who it was about. She asked if it was about the Abbey or anyone and I just said I couldn't say anything one way or the other because it was confidential.
A man ended up contacting me, one day, when I wasn't even thinking about it anymore. Basically, I wrote my short email, and left it to the FBI to decide on. This man who called me up told me he was from Portland FBI field offices. He said he'd gone over my email and had some questions for me. He wasn't S.A. Krouger because his voice was different. This guy was a little more aggressive or assertive.
He asked me how I found out about the PLF. He asked me if I had any dealings with them (the answer was "No"). He asked me if I knew the lawyer who had filed a case against the PLF. My answer was "no" and I didn't even recognize his name. This FBI guy didn't identify himself at all except to say he'd received my email at their offices. I believed him, because no one else knew what I'd even reported. Only the FBI would have known.
So he goes on to tell me I wasn't the only one who had made a report about this matter, but that my report was "the most cogent" one they'd received. I remembered this word because at the time I didn't even know what "cogent" meant, though I supposed it was a good thing because his tone was complimentary.
But then his tone changed and he said it wasn't fraud. I said it sure fit the definition for fraud that I was reading, and I'd gone over the FBI jurisdictions and definitions before filing a report as well. I knew it DID fit for fraud and should be investigated and I gave him the points why. He tried to argue and then said in a cold tone that maybe I should just get together with "so-and-so" (the name of the lawyer who took the case to court) and we could file a lawsuit. He made it sound like I was "in on something" with another party or something but I wasn't. Then he just said he wasn't going to investigate and hung up.
That was it. I thought it was wrong, but I didn't contact the FBI again, unless I possibly sent a follow-up email after my conversation with this one guy. I do know I later sent something to the FBI, an email, inquiring about employment with the FBI. I was interested in possibly investigative work myself, or in being a lawyer for the FBI, and I had a particular interest in corporate crime. I felt white collar criminals got away with far too much, and fighting it would be a way to serve the public with government money, and not go into the hole financially. At that time, I was probably more interested in investigative work, than legal work.
No one contacted me after I sent this email out. I believe I sent it Attn: S.A. Krouger again, because I wouldn't have known where to send it otherwise.
No one contacted me and I dropped it. I had other things to take care of, I thought, and I hadn't even filed my lawsuits yet, and I didn't make contact with anyone from the FBI again until I met S.A. Raul Bujanda at an Oregon federal courthouse, at least a year or more later.
I never told anyone what I had reported until after I left Oregon for Washington State, in 2004, after I was assaulted/harassed by FBI employees Bujanda and Garza. No one knew, not even Christa. All anyone knew, was that I'd made a complaint. I told only Christa about even making a complaint.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)