really dumb, I think. the wording for the headline is completely misleading and a reflection of 'the times' I think. no one writes about "how the ____video blew up" or "how the ______ photo blew up." everyone knows what blew up sounds like, and the title is meant to be misleading i think, to be a draw.
i haven't seen it but not surprised it was featured on jimmy kimmel and sarah whathernames show. I don't know why they don't give her credit for her contributions--i highly doubt all his material is original.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment