Sunday, June 21, 2009

Response To Comment: Hump and Dump

Hello,

I did nothing to myself OR to my son to warrant his removal from me at any time.

If you haven't been reading along, the state's position against me, all along, has been supposedly because I was "delusional" to think I and my son had medical injuries from childbirth and the claim that I was drug seeking when really, I was prescribed narcotics for pain the Wenatchee docs knew I had.

The entire hearing was based on the idea that all these Wenatchee medical professionals believed I was mentally ill to claim I had any injuries. Not one of the reports to CPS came from anyone EXCEPT Wenatchee medical professionals, who KNEW I was trying to sue them for medical malpractice.

Since being in Wenatchee, I have been falsely arrested for "assault" of my grandmother which was THROWN out because it didn't happen. There was not a witness, or a witness statement to support it and I had a ton of email which I sent to my own family telling them about Granny's alzheimers and how she was going into fits. Not only that, I had gone to a counselor about it, who had records, AND there is a Rivercom tape where Granny admits to hitting ME. It wasn't the other way around. I have never been violent torwards anyone. On the same day I was "arrested", it was right before I was going to talk to a Wenatchee World reporter about the FBI sexual harassment claim I had made against Raul Bujanda and Armando Garza.

Granny's own Dr., Dr. Freed, agreed with me she was in the stages of Alzheimers.

On the day of the alleged incident, the claim was that I "held" my grandmother down. That's not what happened. I had just told Granny I was pregnant and she pushed me in the stomach so I reached out to hold her arms away from my stomach and said, "Granny, you can't do that anymore, I'm pregnant." I basically held her arms to the side so she couldn't strike me in the stomach.

I was arrested for that. Right after it happened, I had called my own family and told them someone should be with Granny because she was acting out again, which I'd been reporting to them.

I was trying to move my things out of the house, which I stayed in to help assist her while she had a broken back injury, and called the Wenatchee police to help me get my things assisted. I think my family panicked and thought I'd "reported" someone so they made claims I held Granny's arms. The next thing I knew I was being arrested for "assault" which I never committed. No marks, no bruises, and my grandmother basically confirmed what I said, that I held her arms to the side.

So that got blown up and I was in jail for 14 days, which I've been told I should have sued for. During that time, guards refused to give me kites or paper and when I finally got it, they were refused filing by Judge Warren, which is illegal.

Thereafter, I was "banned" from the hospital after I complained to them about their repeated refusal to treat me for migraine. Dr. Butler had a pain contract for me to receive morphine to control the pain and he WITHDREW it after I questioned why he was just feeding me narcotic painkillers after childbirth and NOT doing diagnostics to find out what was wrong.

Anything recent that's occured, has been outright lies. Most recently, I had one man tell me to borrow his car and then he had someone ELSE call the police and say it was HER car that was stolen. As it turns out, it was his all along and he was the one telling me to use it. So I was flat out framed and who knows why other than to cause problems.

Officer Duke was the arresting officer and she was the same one arrresting me on false charges for "assault" of my grandmother. The evidence was SO strong AGAINST my own family and Granny, that the state didn't want to go to trial at all and dropped everything. They knew what my evidence was.

As for an anti-harassment order filed by John Kaemf, that is a lawyer, a main lawyer for the Abbey, where all my problems began and when police were first used against me, for the church's civil means. It was dirty and they've tried to cover for that and discredit me ever since. I had just told Kaempf I was filing an anti-harassment order against him for contatcting GRANNY about ME, and threatening HER, and he whipped arond and got Judge Warren to push something through for him on default.

Hmmm... what else? oh, I guess the last thing would be an accusation that I held a knife and threatened my housemate which is shocking insomuch as she calls herself a christian, and a missionary too. This woman CHEATED with my fiance, and didn't like it that I caught her and wrote the whole world about it so she turns around and totally lies.

Not only that, she knew my fiance before they ever met, and HOW I have no idea, except there is some idea in my mind that if she's doing "missionary" work in Brazil, and he's working for the state in Colombia, they're connected through a government agency and want to slander me for their own cover.

When I was in D.C., and meeting all these people, I had more than sufficient reason to guess I was dealing with state or Dept. of State or CIA employees. I was being primed to work between the U.S. and Colombia and I said no. They were offering ettiquette and checking my literacy skills and a bunch of other stuff, and Alvaro knew people at the courthouse who were working for the govt.

It was a hump and dump, plain and simple. They wanted me and then they changed their minds.

Hump and dump, courtesy of the U.S. or who knows, joint courtesy with Colombia, because I met the U.S. point person for Colombia in the very beginning.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

On September 15, 2005 a Domestic Violence No Contact Order was issued in Cause No. C17018CHS. Your signature is on that No Contact Order. Cameo, you were arrested on a domestic violence call, which you made. Originally court was scheduled for November 16, 2005 and then changed to December 7, 2005. On December 5, 2005 the case was dismissed. This was due to the fact Mr. and Mrs. Baird would not fill out a police report on the incident of Domestic Violence because they did not want to see you face jail time. You were not bailed out by them due to the fact there was a no contact order issued. Get the facts straight! It was not because you assaulted Mrs. Baird, that was at an earlier date.
You had been kicked out of their house previous to that. You were asked to leave their residence and you did not. Your uncle was present at the time and politely (not forcefully) escorted you out of the house and you then called the police and reported domestic violence. In the State of Washington, someone is arrested on a domestic violence call. The police visited both Mr. and Mrs. Baird, as well as their son and determined you were the one to be arrested.
The domestic violence arrest was not for "assault," it was determined by your call as domestic violence.

Mama said...

Dear Anonymous,

Are you willing to stand corrected? If so, read carefully, because you're misinformed, and if this is what a report says, it is wrong and I can back up the correct version which is:

1. There was never a call made by me for domestic violence. I had actually already moved out of the residence, which can be attested to by several latino orchard workers, whom I lived with for weeks prior to trying to get remaining belongings from the house. In fact, I had been out of the house for at over a month, because, my dear, I became pregnant by one of the workers. So you want the facts? Yes. My son is a son of a Mexican orchard worker and I am proud to say so and to also state I didn't sleep around and that ALL of the workers treated me with more respect than the entire rest of Wenatchee.

Your claim I was still living there is false, and any police report making such a claim is false. I wouldn't have known I was pregnant if I hadn't been at least one month along and I had been there over a month.

For the rest of the story, the TRUE version, go to my next "new post" which I'll make especially for you, and for all of the world, to prove what kind of accuracy was made in the "police report" and to what degree I've been defamed.

Could I sue the county and the city? My dear, when you bring it up, now that I think about it, since I have so many ways of proving them wrong, perhaps I SHOULD.