Monday, December 15, 2008

Filing Under RICO

I'm doing it. I'm getting all the information for suing government entities, and it all requires a formal notice of intent.

So I have to look up samples of what is required.

I can easily use a continuing tort argument in this case, because damages have constantly been accruing.

I also believe I have a lot of leeway if I use RICO, and I can specifically use it for the actions of one or more persons joining together in an effort to obstruct justice or intimidate a witness.

I am considering just one RICO suit, that spans all of the activity against me over the last several years, but if I have to separate them, I'll do so.

I think I can actually use RICO. It fits the facts and has involved more than one party working with other parties. All I have to prove is that people or groups planned to act against me, and that it was to cover crime and intimidate me.

http://video.google.com/videouploadform

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Cameo -

I am not from Wenatchee - as I indicated a couple weeks ago I stumbled across your blog. The only reason I used the phrase "last ditch" was because the email from your aunt made it sound like if you didn't attend the evaluations or whatever, you'd lose parental rights.

Also, I remember a few weeks ago you decided not to call a phone-in hearing because you stated that you weren't going to play by their rules.

If you're so interested in law (although lately you've been playing more "doctor" with all the self-diagnoses) then you should realize that judges can make decisions in your absense that can have consequenses that are hard, if not impossible, to overcome.

Also, after seeing the email you sent to the judge today, you don't seem to realize that proper civil procedure is not emailing your various requests to a judge in lengthy prose.

Anonymous said...

For all of your interest, you are quick to critize, especially if you were not a part of the hearings and only stumbled across this blog a couple weeks ago. I doubt that you've read much of my blog in that couple of weeks and I doubt you know me as well.

If you're so interested in counseling, why don't you go back to college and take some more courses, and take one in grammar and spelling while you're at it, because while you tell me I do not know how to follow civil procedure, you do not even know how to follow basic rules in grammatical structure or spelling. Take another look at your comment which you placed in parentheses.

I am a terrible speller too, but at least I'm not critizing the written format of someone else's letters.

If you want to know what I know of civil procedure, my dear, you can take a look at the filed motions I made for two different lawsuits which held up for 2 years, despite desperate attempts by the defendants to put them away sooner.

I know more about civil procedure than you will ever know about the justice system, and I think you're writing out of self-interest and nothing more.

There is nothing wrong with writing a request in lengthy prose. Letters can be filed and especially, as a terribly "mentally ill" woman, who has been forced to go pro se, leniency is the rule, not the exception.

If I file an actual lawsuit, I know how to go by the rules. I also know what rules the court and judge and state should have played by, and they didn't follow the rules, and worse, they made illegal decisions.

You wouldn't know, or would you?

You don't even know that writing a simple request or notice for address change doesn't require a formal format. You actually think making a request for mail to be sent to a new address is "civil procedure."

Civil procedure concerns rules of motions, timelines, and evidentiary rules, not simple address change or reminders (in lengthy prose) of a judge's failures to uphold the laws of the land.

Please don't write again until you prove to me you actually know more than I do, and that you're better at legal analysis. I was willing to listen to you and publish your comments, but to take advice, I would have to respect the person it's coming from, and you give me nothing to respect.

There are criminals, who are sitting in jail right now, who file for habeus corpus on their own, because of this system's lazy and lousy public defenders, who know more about procedure than you.

And my heart goes out to them. My message to the families who know their children were railroaded simply because they couldn't afford a private attorney who would fight for them, have a friend in me. Should I ever fix what has been done to me, my first priority would be to set others free.

For now, all I can do is draw attention to the fact that illegal actions have been taken by judges in Wenatchee, on a regular basis, and despite repeated attempts by the ACLU and other groups, to fix the problem, the problem persists.

Wenatchee needs to be incorporated into King County as it has proven, over and over again, it cannot responsibly handle the challenges that the justice system presents in their small, and small-minded town.